Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Motibhai Nathabhai Vs. Ramchandra Martandrav Vahivatdar

Decided On : Nov-15-1972

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Section 88B, Agricultural Lands Act, the Tenancy Act', Section 84, Section 4B, the Tenancy Act, Section 4B, the Tenancy Act, Section 31, Exhibit 30, Section 88B of the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 3, the Tenancy Act, Property Act, Section 106, Chapter V, Chapter V, Section 3, the Tenancy Act, Section 106, Section 106, Section 3, the Tenancy Act, Section 3, the Tenancy Act, Section 3 of the Tenancy Act, Section 4B, the Tenancy Act, Section 89, the Tenancy Act, Section 89, the Bombay Tenancy Act, Section 89, the Tenancy Act, the Bombay Tenancy Act', the Bombay Act, the Bombay Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 4, Section 3, Section 3-A, Section 88-B(1, Section 88B(1, the Tenancy Act, Bombay Tenancy Act, the Tenancy Act, Section 88B, Section 88B -it, Section 4-A, Section 4B, Section 106, Section 84, Section 4B. Therefore, Section 88B of the Tenancy Act, Section 8, Section 9, Section 10, the Tenancy Act, Section 10A, Section 11, Section 10A. Section 13, Section 27, Section 84, Section 84, Section 84, Section 106, Section 117, Section 106, Section 88E, the Tenancy Act, Section 88E, the Tenancy Act, Section 88E, the Tenancy Act, Section 31, Devasthan Inams Act', Section 31, the Tenancy Act, Section 88Bof, the Tenancy Act, the Civil Procedure Code

CARDINAL: 1, four, 9, 9A, 9B 9C, 2, 1, two, 1, 30, two, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 9A, 9B, 9C, 4B, 533, one, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 3, 4, three, two, one, 3-A, 4, 36, 4B, 9A, 9B, 9C, 13, two, 2, two, 22, 23, 15, 24

ORG: Ramji Mandir, Ramii Mandir, the Bombay Tenancy, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, Plaintiff, Court, the District Court, Appellate, the District Court, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Provisions of Section 4B, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Sections 3, the Provisions of the, the Bombay Public Trusts Act, Proviso, the Ramji Mandir Trust, the Bombay Public Trusts Act, the Bombay Public Trusts Act, Sections 3, the Provisions Contained in Chapters VI, Sections 3, Sections, Plaintiff, the Provisions of Section 117, the State Government, the State Government, under-'No, Plaintiff, Sections 3, Sections 3, Sections 3, the Bombay Tenancy Act, Appellate, Appellate, Sections 3, the Bombay Tenancy Act, Section 4A, Section 4A, Protected, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, Sections 3, Possession, Plaintiff, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, Court, Certificate

GPE: Baroda, Purposes, rejected.10

LOC: the Panchmahals District, Plaint, Chapters VI

DATE: April 26, 1958, 1948, annual, March 31, 1961, 31st December 1960, August 9. 1961, annual, 1969, annual, April 26., 1958, 10A, 11, 13, 27, 1950, 1950, 1950, 8, 9, 10, 10A, 11, 13, 27, 1882, six months', the end of the year, the years, 1956-57, 1958-59, 1939, 1939, 1943, 1939, 1943, 1939, less than six years, the first day of January 1938, the first day of January 1945, the first day of January 1938, the first day of January 1945, six years, the first day of January 1933, the first day of January 1945, six years, six years, the eighth day of November 1947, 1939, less than six years, the first day of January 1918, the first day of January 1945, 1946, 1948, 1939, 1943, 9, 10, 10A, 11, 27, annual, three months', annual, six months, the end of the year, November 15, 1969

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, second, fourth, second, third, third, second, Firstly

PERSON: Patel, Schedule, suit5, Karlekar, Patel, Patel, Gazette, Instant, Instant, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Schedule, Patel, Schedule, Schedule, Patel, if:-, Mamlatdar, Schedule, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Karlekar, Schedule, Schedule, Patel

LANGUAGE: Chapters

TIME: 4 of that Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //