Surat Panjrapole Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Mar-17-1999

Court : Gujarat

LAW: the IT Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, the IT Act, the IT Act

PERSON: J.N. Bhatt, Art

ORG: the Bombay Public Trust Act, inter alia, CIT, Choryashi Taluka Dudh, Sahakari Madli Ltd., audi alterem, Bar, Court, the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, Panjrapole

DATE: 1956, 1796, Oct., 1998, 1961, annually, 1989, 1st April, 1989 to 31st March, 1990, 11th July, 1990, 1st April, 1990 to 31st March, 1993, 6th April, 1993, 1998, more than eight years, 5 years, five years, 7th April, 1998, 16th Sept., 1998, the years 1994-95 to 1997-98, annual, 31st March, 1998, that year, 1st April, 1998, 1796, 1796, eight years, 1796, more than two centuries, 1960, the second half of March, the financial year, four weeks

ORDINAL: 13th

CARDINAL: 226, 2., 3, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 4., 5, thousands, almost 93, hundreds, 35, 59, 6, one

GPE: India

NORP: Gujarat

PRODUCT: Panjarapole

MONEY: 3 per cent