Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dr. R.M. Saboo Vs. Asstt. Cit

Decided On : Sep-30-2004

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

LAW: section 132B(4, section 132B(4, the Income Tax Act, section 132, section 132, section 143 or section 144, section 132(5, section 132(5, section 132(5

CARDINAL: two, 12, 2003.Before, 171, 132B(4)(a, 1, 5, 1, 216, 759, 68, 12, 1998.We, 1, 2, more than one

ORG: CIT, Hyderabad, the Hon'ble Andhra Pradesh High Court, Bakelite Hylam Ltd., CIT, AP, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, CIT, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Modi Industries Ltd., CIT, ITR, SC, The Apex Court, CIT, the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court, Bakelite Hylam Ltd., the Apex Court, S. Sankappa &amp, Ors, ITO, SC, the Apex Court, S. Sankappa &amp, the Supreme Court, Modi Industries Ltd., Departmental Representative

DATE: 15-9-2003, years 1989-90, 1990-91, the period February, 1994 to March, 1998, year 1989-90, May/September, 1994 to March, 1998, 1990-91, 1961, March, 2003, March, 1988, the period of six months, 1995, 1968, March

MONEY: fifteen per cent

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //