Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

C.N. Bros. and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad

Decided On : Jan-10-1961

Court : Gujarat

LAW: Section 66(2, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 66, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article l(f, Constitution, Section 66, Section 66(2, Section 66, section 43, Section 36, Section 49, Section 49, Section 5, Section 5, Section 36, Chapter VI, Section 5, Section 49, Section 49, Section 36, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Constitution, Section 5, Section 49, Court Fees Act, Section 49(1, Section 5, Section 5, Section 66(2, Section 5, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49, Section 49 .(1, Section 49(1, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 66(2, the Income Tax Act, Section 66(2, Article 270 of the Constitution for the, Section 66(2, Article 285 of the Constitution, Article, Constitution, Article 14, Constitution, Constitution, Section 66(2, the Income Tax Act, Section 66(2, the Income Tax Act, Article 226 of the Constitution or Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act, Article 226 or Section 45 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 66(2, the Income Tax Act, Section 66(2, Section 66, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 5, Section 23(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 66(2

ORG: Court, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Court, Court, Appellate, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, valorem court-fees, Court, Advocate-General, the High Court of, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bench, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court of Justice, document.x, x., Schedule IV, Certificate, Collected, Schedules, Court, Schedules, Legislature, Court, Court, Legislature, Schedule IV, the Court-Fees Act, Court, Schedules, Court, Legislature, Legislature, Advocate-Gene-ral, Company, LK 208, Advocate-General, Court, Legislative, Schedule 1 of the new Act, Legislature, State, the High Court, Income Tax, the High Court, Advocate General, Income Tax, the Union of India, the State of Gujarat, State, Advocate General, State, State, the State Government, State, Income Tax, the High Court, the Union of the taxation, State, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, Legislature, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Lordships of Privy Council, Income Tax, Lordships, Advocate General, the High Court

CARDINAL: 2, 19.895/-, us.3, 50/-, 2, 2, three-fold, 1, 3, 4, 16, 66, 1922.One, fifty, one, 1, one, 1, 1, two, 1, one, one, 1, 4, 3, 1, 1, 1, two, 1, 2, 1, 1, 16, 50, more than one, four, 16, One, two, two, 59, 1, two, two, 16, 16, fifty, 61, three, 16, 16, 16, one half

GPE: law.2, Gujarat, valorem, Courts, valorem, valorem, Commr, Bombay, valorem, valorem

DATE: year 1956-57, 1959, 1959, 1959, years, 1959, year 1956-57and, 1959, 1959, 1-8-1959, 1959, '49(1).-, 1877, 1959, 49, 1870, 47, 1st August, 1959, the same day, 1870, August 1959, 1960, 1959, '25, 1959, 16

EVENT: Samvat Year 2011'

MONEY: 5.9 per cent, ten per cent

PERSON: Bench, S. P. Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, consideration:-'5, Schedule, Mehta, Mehta.12, Mehta, quam pereat, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Mehta, Schedule, Mehta, Kirchand Sunderji, Mehta, Mehta, Dalmia, Krishna Dalmia, Tendolkar, Mehta, Mehta, Khemchand Ramdas, K. H. Kaji, List

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, second, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, second, first, seventh, second, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, second, first, 1st, first, second, second, first, second, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, first, second, third, second

TIME: under this Act

NORP: Indian

WORK_OF_ART: SecondSchedule, 'Computation of Fees', Schedule to the Constitution, Schedule II

PRODUCT: Steps

LOC: case.27

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //