Subodhchandra and Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer and ors.

Decided On : Dec-30-1994

Court : Gujarat

LAW: section 132, section 132, article 226(2, section 132, article 226(2, Constitution, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132, section 132

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 3, 1 to 3, 2,881.750, 4., 1, 3, 4, 5, 6., one, one, one, 23x3, 218, 436, 22, approximately 2,900, 8., 9, 10, 4, 11, 4, 1 to 3, 4, 12, 2, 4, 3, 13, 3, 15, 4, 4, 16, 5, 17, 1 to 3, 4, 18, 4, about 2,900, about 2,900, 19, 1, 4, 5, 7, 9A, 20, 1, 132, 1, 21, 4, 132, 22, roughly 2,900, 23, 5, 1, 1A, 24, 25, 5, 26, 3, 3, 3, 27, 9A, 1, 8), 9, 4, 28, 3, 4, 3. 29, 2,881.750, 13,66,000, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 3, 30

DATE: January 23, 1995, 1961, 1,395.700------------------------------------------------509, 2,881.750, September 30, 1994, 14, 120 days, a period of, fifteen days, seven days, January 3, 1995, ten days

PERSON: M. J. Thakore, Nos, Madras, Priyadarshini Jewellers, Ashit M. Shah, Mulchand R. Shah, Jothi, H. S., Ashit M. Shah, Ashit M. Shah, Ashit M. Shah, Ashit M. Shah, Priyadarshini Jewellers, Nos, Shah, Ashit M. Shah, M. J. Thakore, Assessing Officer, Thakore, Nos, Ashit M. Shah, Ashit M. Shah, Rs, Thakore

ORG: Subodhchandra and Co., the Government of India, Coimbatore, Belgaum, Paddhari, Morve, angadia, Government, Coimbatore, Priyadarshini Jewellers, Purity Gross, Subodhchandra and Co., Priyadarshini Jewellers, the State of Gujarat, inter alia, Assessing

GPE: Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, India, Hyderabad, Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Dhanji Street, Bombay, Gujarat, Bombay, Ahmedabad, Bombay, Bombay, Ahmedabad, Bombay

PRODUCT: Calcutta, F, C-1

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

QUANTITY: 4 22

WORK_OF_ART: the Constitution of India

FAC: Madras