Anand Municipality Vs. Union of India and ors.

Decided On : Jul-28-1960

Court : Gujarat

LAW: the Bombay Reorganisation Act, S. 87, Section 3 of the Act, Section 30, section 88, the Reorganisation Act, Section 87, the Reorganisation Act, Section 3, Section 4, Constitution, Section 3, S. 87, S. 87, S. 87, the Reorganization Act, S. 87

ORG: the Bombay High Court, this High Court, the Gujarat High Court, the Bombay High Court, Advocate General, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Andhra High Court, Court, the Andhra High Court, the High Court, Court, Advocate General, S. 87, Court, the State of Bombay, Legislature, State, the High Court, the High Court, Sections, under:-'2, State, the State of Gujarat, the State of Bombay, the State of Bombay, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the State of Maharashtra, Legislature, the Union List, the Central Government, the State Government, the State of Maharashtra, State, the Bombay High Court, State, S. 88, the High Court, the State of Gujarat.(5, State, S. 87, the First Schedule, the State Government, S. 87, S. 87, S. 3, the State of Bombay, Legislature, the State of Gujarat, State, High Court, High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Legislature, Legislature, the State of Bombay, State, State, S. 87, the State of Bombay, State, the State of Gujarat, State, the State of Bombay, the State of Gujarat, S. 87, Court, Court, Court, the State of Gujarat, the Bombay High Court, the State of Bombay, the High Court, Court, High Court, Court, this High Court, S. 87, Advocate General, this High Court, Court of CO-ordinating jurisdiction, the High Court, the High Court, the Advocate General, the High Court of Andhra, the Andhra High Court, Court a Court of CO-ordinate jurisdiction, Lordship, the High Court of Andhra, the High Court, Madras, the Andhra High Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the State of Gujarat, Advocate General, the Bombay High Court, Court, Court, Court, the Sections of the Reorganization Act, Court, the High Court

DATE: 1-5-1960, 1960, 32, 34, 35, 36, one year, that day, '89, S. 88, 28, S. 28, S. 30

PERSON: Miabhoy, Subbarayudu v. State (, Broach, Surat, Kutch Districts, Thana District, Taloda Talukas, Parts, Taluka, Taluka, Taluka, Dahnu Taluka, Thana District, Songadh Taluka, Sahara Taluka, Broach, Patel, S. 30, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Patel, Court

GPE: Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, the State of, Bombay, the State of Gujarat, Bombay, Bombay, Banaskantha, Mehsana, Ahmedabad, Kaira, Panch, Baroda, Surendranagar, Jamnagar, Junagadh, Bhavnagar, Nawapur, West Khandesh District, Akkalkuwa, West Khandesh District, Bombay, Umbergaon, Surat District, Surat District, Gujarat, the State of Gujarat, Gujarat, Gujarat, Bombay, Gujarat, States, Bombay, the State of Gujarat, the State of Gujarat, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, States, the State of Bombay, Gujarat, the State of Gujarat, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Bombay, Gujarat, Bombay, Bombay

FAC: Andhra 87

PRODUCT: a Full Bench, a Full Bench, a Full Bench

CARDINAL: one, 5, 1, 1, 88, two, two, three, 3, 30, two, two, One, 91, two, two, 11

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, first, first, first, second

NORP: Amreli, Umbergoan, Gujarat, Gujarat, Maharashtra

EVENT: Parts II

WORK_OF_ART: Legal and Miscellaneous Provisions'