Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Wimco Ltd. Vs. Liberty Match Co. and ors.

Decided On : Jul-07-1988

Court : Gujarat

LAW: the Indian Companies Act, section 2(1)(a, section 3, section 36A, section 36A, section 9, the Civil Procedure Code, section 12B, Section 12, section 193, the Indian Penal Code Section 12A, section 12B, section 12B, section 12A, section 9

ORG: D.H. Shukla, Wimco Ltd., Indian Mercantile Chambers, Liberty Match Company, Kovilpatti, Rs.25, Control and Tax, Prize Competitions (Tax, Chamber, City Civil Court, No.1922, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, State, AIR 1936, Tea, the Division Bench, Mohandas, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, State, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Avon Cycles P. Ltd., MRTPC, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Commission, the Central Government, State Government, The Supreme Court, AIR, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., Union of India, AIR 1979 SC 798, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, AIR 1974 SC 1320, the Andhra Pradesh Estate Abolition Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Central Government, State Government, Commission, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practise Act, the supreme Court

NORP: J.1, Chameli

PERSON: Ramjibhai Kamani Marg, Kapas, Nos, Nos, Kapas, Kapas, Nos, Ahmedabad, S.D.Shah, Shah, Mohandas Manumal, Sesha Ayyar, Krishna Ayyar, Jayantilal Bhimjibhai, Rs.25, Taylor, Smetten, Hawkins J., Taylor, Smetten, Taylor, Smetten, P. V. Nanavati, Nanavati, Mohandas Manumal, Nanavati, Nanavati, Nanavati, Nanavati, Prasad Gupta v. Murli Prasad, Nanavati, Nanavati, Nanavati, Nanavati, Surat, Shah, P.V.Nanavati, P.V. Nanavati, S. D. Shah, Shah, Nanavati, Nanavati

DATE: last 65 years, last two years, 1958, May 11, 1988, 1988, 1969, 1979, 1883, 1883, 1883, 1979, 1979, 1986, 1036, 12A, 1908, 1979, 12A, 12B, 12C, the month of December, 1987, monthly, January to March 1988, 15 days, today, today, July 7, 1988, today

CARDINAL: 1, 3 and 4, 5, 1, 6, 7, 1.3, 1, 2, Re.1, 60 dozen, Re.1, between Re.1 to Rs.25, 5, 5.9, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 60 dozen, between Re.1 and, one, four, two, Re.1, 8, 2s.6d, 211, 11, 11, 12, 20, 226, 13, one, 14, 3, 3, 15, 16, 18, 20, 226, 60, 20, 12B, 1968]3SCR662, 49, 419, 454, 49, 21, 12, 228, less than twenty-five, five, 23, 1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 10, more than 765, one, 5, 5

FAC: Tamil Nadu

WORK_OF_ART: Chameli' and 'Flying Horse'

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, Chameli

GPE: the City of Ahmedabad, the City of Ahmedabad, the City of Ahmedabad, Bombay, Gujarat, loss.10, singal, England, Gujarat, Gujarat, India, Dhulabhai, Ahmedabad, Baroda, Ahmedabad, Ahmedabad

TIME: 60 dozens, the particular Act, the particular Act

ORDINAL: second, fourth, fourth, first, third, third, fourth, first

PERCENT: at least 20%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //