Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

V.K. Gemini Vs. Chandran and anr.

Decided On : Jul-14-2006

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section, the Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 139:10, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 138, Section 142, Section 138, Section 142, Section 138, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, the Amendment act, the Amendment Act, Chapter XVII, Chapter XVII, Chapter XVII, the Amendment Act, Section 138, Section 138, the Amendment Act, Section 138, Section 138, Section 7 - 'Payee' - The, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8 - ', Section 9, Section 9, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 8, Section 7 of the Act, Section 138, Section 9, Section 8, Section 118(g, Section 118, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, the Amending Act, Section 138, chapter 49, Section 139, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139 of the Act, Section 8, Section 139 of the Act, Section 8, Section 139, Section 8, Section 139, Section 138 i.e., Section 139, Section 139, Section 138, Section 139 of the Act, Section 8, Section 139, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 139, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Section 139 of the Act, Section 138, Section 139, Section 138, Section 139, Section 139

PERSON: K. Hema, BRIEFLY:2, Exts, Dl, D2, Counsel, Kali Ram v. State, Hiten P. Dalai, Chapter XVII, Reasons, Reasons, Narendra Singh v. State of M.P., P. N. Krishna Lal v. Govt, Kali Ram v. State, Reasons, course'.-, Moothan Sons v., Will, Will, J.K. Cotton Spg, Kumar Ghose, Arabinda Bose, Nathi Devi v. Radha Devi Gupta, Ghanshyamdas, Reasons, Exts, Dl, D2, Srinivas Ramnath Khatod, Bratindranath Banerjee 2001

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 138, 60,000/-from, 1 to 3, 1 to 3, one, 2000CriLJ1464, two, 2, 142, 139, 1-4, 2004CriLJ2842, 2, 187, three, 1974CriLJ1, 2001CriLJ1250, THREE, one, 9, transferee, transferee, two, just two, two, three, three, 1961)ILLJ540SC, 1953]4SCR1, 142, three, 138, 139, 142, 60,000/-, 60,000/-, 20-3-98, 26, 1, 1, 2, one, 62, 5, three, one, One

ORG: FACTS, Magistrate's Court, Ext, Notice, Court, Ext, Court, LIABILITY, Kusum Ingots & Alloys Ltd., Pennar Peterson Securities Ltd., PURPOSE, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, HOLDER, HOLDER, Court, cheque;(b, Court, Sections 138, The Statement of Objects, the Statement of Objects, the Supreme Court, The Criminal Justice System, the Supreme Court, The Statement of Objects, Jayaswals Neco Ltd., the Supreme Court, Emphasis, Holder, Holder, Holder, HOLDER, Court, HOLDER, Court, HOLDER, the Supreme Court, U. Ponnappa, Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd., Act, Court, Court, record.43, Court, Court, Court, Shin-Etsu Chemical Co. Ltd., Aksh Optifibre Ltd., Court, Parliament, Courts, Wvg., Mills Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Vide Aswini, Court, Court, the 'Statement of Object, Court, Court, Schizophrenia, Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Cri LJ 4647, Bank, the Supreme Court, Cri LJ 4647, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, firstly, first

DATE: the past 8 to 9 years, 1974CriLJ1, 1973, 1988, 1989, 1995, 1989, '35, 1964]51ITR557(SC, Umber, DW3, about 9 years, six days, Just six days, one week's, the past 8 years, DW3, March 1996, April 1996, 2001, 2001

PRODUCT: Section 138, Section 138, the Shri Ishar Alloy Steels Ltd.

GPE: Kerala, name.27, Hiten P. Dalal, Hiten P. Dalal's, Counsel

LOC: DUE':28

FAC: Sections 8, Sections 8 and 9, Sections 8

TIME: the same Amendment Act

EVENT: PW 1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //