income Tax Officer Vs. Bombaywala Readymade Stores

Decided On : Mar-19-2004

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

LAW: the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 139(1, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 144, Section 144, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, ITR 411 (Mad, the Indian IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 255(4, the IT Act, the IT Act, Section 132, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 69, the IT Act, Section 139(1, Section 139(2, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act whereas Expln, Section 271(1)(c, ITR 411 (Mad, the Indian IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 255(4, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271, Section 271(1)(c, Section 38(1)(c, Section 44(2, Section 28(1)(b, Section 28(1, Section 28(1)(b, Section 28(1)(b, Section 28(1)(b, Section 28(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 28(1)(a, Section 28(1)(c, Section 28(1)(c, Section 34(3, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 139, the IT Act

CARDINAL: 1, 4,95,410, 5,36,838, 3,72,907, 3, 5, 3, 3, 5, 3, 5, 8, as many as ten, 3, 3, 3, 3, 46, 34, 850, 4,95,410, 2, 10,29,730, 5,36,838, 5,52,572 to 4,63,653, 5,36,838, 4,95,410, 3, 5, 5, two, 3, 5, 10, 11, 3, 3, 12, 46, 34, 850, 578, 8, 3, 5, 271(1, 9, 205, 3, 5, 3, 5, 41, one, one, 13, three, 68, 172, 258, 668, 147, 4,95,410

DATE: 17th Jan., 1995 of CIT(A)-in, 1961, 31st Aug., 1984, 4,95,410, 31st Aug., 1984, between 1st April, 1976, 31st March, 1989, 1984, Oct., 1984, 31st Aug., 1984, Oct., 1984, 31st Aug., 1984, the assessment year, last three years, last three years, a particular year, 1962, 1958, 1922, 1st April, 1964, 1961, 1985-86, today, 1985-86, 9th Aug., 1989, Aug., 1989, 1st Oct., 1984, 31st Aug., 1984, a particular year, 1962, 1958, 1922, April, 1964, 1971, April, 1964, 1994, 1117, eight years, four years, 1961, four years, the assessment year, 1922, four years, 1968, 1988, 2002, 1961

PERSON: Baroda, leviable.9, Thoppil Kutti Eroor v., Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia Bahadur v. Union, Explns, A.M., J.M., A.M., Thoppil Kutti Eroor v., Madhav Rao Jivaji Rao Scindia Bahadur v. Union, Shri R.C. Gupta, A.M., Shri Gupta, Shri Gupta, Addl, Anr, Shri J.P. Shah, J.M., Shri Shah, Shri Shah, Pleader, Pleader, Srinivasan, Lordships, K.P. Reddy v. CIT, Thakur Veerpal, Dass Jewellers, J.M.14, J.M.

ORG: AO, yr.1985-86.2, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, Departmental Representative, Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, AO, AO, Department, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, S. Santhosa Nadar v. ITO, CIT, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, AO, the Revenue Department, G.P., AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, Tribunal, Bench, AO, AO, S. Santhosa Nadar v. ITO, CIT, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Departmental Representative, AO, Explns, AO, CIT, Departmental Representative, Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh High Court, CIT, Explns, CIT, Hon'ble Mysore High Court, S. Narayanappa &amp, CIT, Lordships, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO, S. Santhosa Nadar v. ITO, Madras High Court, High Courts, Departmental Representative, AP, CIT, CIT, ITR, Sections 276C, AO

MONEY: 100 per cent, 7 per cent, 100 per cent

GPE: Expln, Expln, assessee, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, J.M., Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Explanations, Expln, Explanations, Bros., Singh

PRODUCT: us.3, Bench

ORDINAL: 1st, 1st, first, first, Third

EVENT: SC 530

NORP: Explanations, Thoppil Kutti Eroor

LOC: Expln