Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

C.J. Thomas and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Decided On : Dec-15-2008

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 124A, the Railways Act, the Railway Amendment Act 28 of 1994, Section 124A of the Act and Section 13(IA, the Tribunal Act, Section 124A of the Act, Section 13, the Tribunal Act, chapter Vii of the Railways Act, Section 82A, the Railways Act, Section 124A of the Railways Act, Section 124A, Section 24, the Tribunal Act, Section 13, Section 13, the Claims Tribunal;(b, Act 28, Section 13, Section 24, the Tribunal Act, Section 13-(IA, the Tribunal Act, Section 15, Section 13', Section 15, the Tribunal Act, Section 13, the Tribunal Act, Section 13, Section 13, Section 124A', Section 13, Section 13, Section 15, the Tribunal Act, Section 13, the Tribunal Act, Section 13' in Section 24, the Tribunal Act, Section 15, the Tribunal Act, Section 124A of the Act.8, Section 124A of the Act, Act 28, Section 124A of the Act, Section 124 of the Act, Section 124, Act 28, Section 124A of the Act and Sub-section, Section 13, the Tribunal Act, Section 124A of the Act, Section 13, the Tribunal Act, Section 24, the Claims Tribunal Act, Section 13 ', Section 13, Section 24, the Division Bench, Act 28, Act 28

PERSON: Thomas P. Joseph, J.1, Quilandy, Quilandy, Quilandy, Statutes, Rylands v. Fletcher, Railways, Vijayasankar, K.T. Thomas, Vijayasankar, Vijayasankar, Vijayasankar, Rathi Menon v. Union, M.F. A. No., Quilandy, Quilandy, Rathi Menon's

ORG: the Railway Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Mangalore-Chennai Mail, the Tribunal in, Tribunal, Tribunal, O.S. No, the Sub Court, the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, Learned Sub, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Sub Court, Union of India, Learned Counsel, Tribunal, Learned Counsel, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Union of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal,-, for-(i, and(b, Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal under Sub-section, Court, Tribunal, Court, the Civil Court, Tribunal, the Railway Administration, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Sub-section, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Sub-section, Parliament, Tribunal, Madhya Pradesh, the Division Bench, Parliament, Tribunal, Case a Division Bench, Court, Court, the Claims Tribunal', the Claims Tribunal, Parliament, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, Learned Counsel, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Court, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Civil Court, the Claims Tribunal', Tribunal, Tribunal, Learned Sub Judge, the Sub Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Apex Court, Tribunal, the Sub Court, the Sub Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal

DATE: 1994, 6002, 24-5-1991, the year 1992, 1 -3-1993, 1994, 1989, 19-9-2001, 24-5-1991, 1994, 4084, 6002, that day, 1989, 24 of 1989, 1989, 24 of 1989, that day, 1)(a, 1994, 1994, 1868, 1994, 14-7-1992, 1994, 11-10-1991, 1994, day, 1994, 1994, 2001, the day

CARDINAL: 1-8-1994, 12, 30-3-1994, 1-8-1994, 1, 36, 1-8-1994, 19-9-2001, 157, 125, 2008.3, 124A, 13(IA, 1, 2, 1-8-1994, 1, 124A, 13(IA, 1-8-1994, 1, 1, 1, 1-8-1994, 1, 1-8-1994, 1-8-1994, 1-8-1994, 330, 1-8-1994, 5, 1-8-1994, 26, 14, 24, 1, 15, 28(3, 1-8-1994, 1-8-1994, 21, 22, 125, 19-9-2001

GPE: Train, M.F.A, Tribunal, Vijayasankar v. Union of India 1995, Train, IA, IA, IA, Clauses, IA, IA, IA, IA, IA, IA, IA, IA, IA, IA, Counsel, Statish

FAC: Thrikkodi Railway Station

PERCENT: 9%, 12%, 9%, 12%, 9%

NORP: Satish, Claims, Claims, Claims, Claims, Satish, Satish

PRODUCT: LR 3

EVENT: SC 1335

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //