T.M. Suresh Vs. Food Inspector and anr. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jul-25-1989

Court: Kerala

LAW: Section 16(1)(a, Rule 17, Rule 18, Rule 18, Section 13(2B, the Evidence Act

ORG: M.M. Pareed Pillay, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, Learned Counsel, State, Cri LJ 1137, Cri LJ 898 (FB, Division, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, the Local (Health) Authority, Public, Learned Counsel, the Food Inspector, the Local (Health) Authority, Ext, Public, Ext, the Food Inspector, the Supreme Court, the Food Inspector's, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Food Inspector, the Food Inspector, Cri LJ 1137, Court, the Food Inspector, the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, Ext, the Food Inspector, Court, Ext, Court

NORP: J.1, Maharashtra

DATE: the 2nd, 1986, 6 months, 1988, 47, 1987, 1987, 1987, 1988, working day, working day, Rule 18, 1988, 47, Rules 17, 1987, 1987, 18.6, 1987, 1988, 20-12-1984

LANGUAGE: S.T.

PERSON: Ernakulam, Rajkaran, v. Velayudhan, Mathukutty v. State of, 2 Ker, Shamsuddin J., v. Velayudhan, Mathukutty, 2 Ker, Cri LJ

CARDINAL: 1,000/-, 17, one, 18, two, two, 10, 18, 18, 18.5, 17, 17, about 2, 12, 2.60, 15, approximately 9

ORDINAL: first, first

PRODUCT: P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 1, P.W. 2, P.W. 1

GPE: Kerala, Kerala

TIME: 45 p.m.

QUANTITY: 675 ml