Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

T. K. Shahal Hassan Musaliar Vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes and Others.

Decided On : Aug-29-1990

Court : Kerala

LAW: the Travancore Income-tax Act, the Travancore Act, the Travancore, Act, the Thangal Kunju Musaliar, The Tax Recovery Officer, section 222, section 224, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Travancore Income-tax Act, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, section 156, Chapter 17, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, section 159, section 24B(2, section 2(7, section 222, section 23, section 156, section 23.'See, section 222, section 222, section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, article 32 of the Constitution, article 265 of the Constitution, article 265, section 9(1, section 3, the Central Act, section 9, the Travancore Income-tax Act, section 30, section 34, section 36, section 38, section 3 of the Opium Act, the Travancore Act, section 220(3, section 220(2, article 226, article 32, section 9(1, section 9, article 226, section 220, the Travancore Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Travancore Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act, section 13, the Indian Finance Act, section 3 of the Act of, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act, the Travancore Act

PERSON: K. P. RADHAKRISHNA MENON J. - The, Musaliar, Thangle Kunge Musaliar, Isha Beevi, Nos, Nos, Isha Beevi, Isha Beevi, levy penalty, Isha Beevi, E. Alfred, T. M. K. Abdul Kassim, R. P. Janardhana v. Agrl, Hoystead v. Commissioner of Taxation, Lal Ramji Dass v., Palkhivalas Law, Nanak Singh, Isha Beevi, Nos

ORDINAL: third, second, first, second, second, third, 4th, second, first, second, second, second, third

DATE: February 19, 1966, the years 1119, 1120 and, 1122 to 1125, 1950-51, 1922, the assessment years 1119 and, 1120, September 25,1957, the assessment years 1122, 1956-57, 40, the year 1968, December 31, 1965.For, 1961, 1968, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1968, the day of July 20, 1976, December 31, 1965, July 29, 1969, almost 30 years ago, 2287, 1968, 85, one year, a subsequent year, 1929, every year, 1926, 1145, 1146, 1372, 1950, 1096, 1119, 1 of 1119, 1121, 1121, 1120, 1120, 1121, 1121, 1124, one year, the last day, the financial year, the last day, the financial year, 1922, 1950, these two years, 1922, 1961, 1961, 7, 21

ORG: Malayalam Era, the Central Government, Malayalam Era, the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, Malayalam Era, Thangalkunju Musaliar, the Tax Recovery Office, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Tax Recovery Office, this Honble Court, this Honble Court, the Division Bench, the the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, Original Petition No, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, ITO, First Addl, ITO, the Supreme Court, the Mysore High Court, Raja Pid Naik v. Agrl., ITO, ITO, The Allahabad High Court, Thangal Kunju Musaliar, the Tax Recovery Office, CIT, ITC, AC 155, CIT, Shri Agastyar Trust, the Delhi High Court, ITO, the Supreme Court, Union of India, The Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Department, the Travancore Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, Commission, The Travancore Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, ITO, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Virudhunagar Steel Rolling Mills Ltd., The Supreme Court, the Travancore Taxation of Income (Investigation Commission, the Division Bench, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Department, Department, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, The Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Department, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Department, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Department, Department

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, P-1, P-1, Indian

CARDINAL: 9,15,458, 31,34,562, two, 50,020, 50,42,970.34, 14,42,020, 48, 1, 2, 3, 4, 492, 1971]80ITR82(Ker, 95, 80, eleven, 1 to 22, 22, 12 to 22, 11, 1975]101ITR449(SC, 2, 53, 1975]101ITR449(SC, eleven, 25,42,020, two, 1, 2, 1975]101ITR449(SC, 1, eleven, 2, 3, 220, 85, 159, 220, 85, 220, 85, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 85, 3, two, 1962]44ITR442(SC, 1962]46ITR149(SC, 85, 1977]106ITR540(All, 1, 2, 3, 11, 11, 85, 11, 4, 226, 1984]149ITR609(Mad, 1978]115ITR842(Delhi, 1970)ILLJ10SC, 226, 6, 539, 9(1, 9(1, 1, 5, 2, 2, 58, 66, 9(1, 1975]101ITR457(SC, two, 1, 1968]70ITR726(SC, two, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 173, 11, 220, 85, 1975]101ITR449(SC, 457, 90, 80, 1, 11, 11, 11

WORK_OF_ART: the Travancore Income-tax Act, the Travancore Income-tax Act, the Travancore Excess Profits Tax Act, the Travancore Income-tax Act, the Travancore Income-tax Act

PRODUCT: Schedule

EVENT: D-1

GPE: Addl, T. M. M. Sankaralinga Nadar, Bros., Chiranji, Kanga

FAC: Satya Pal Verma v. ITO, 8th Edn

LOC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //