Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Sulaiman Sahib Vs. Mohemmed Moosa
Decided On : Feb-28-2003
Court : Kerala
LAW: Section 12(3, Section 11(2, Section 12(3, Section 11, Section 12(3, Section 12(3, Section 11, Section 12(3, Section 12(3, Section 12(3, Section 12(3, Section 11, Section 11(2)(b, Section 11(3, Section 20 of the Act, Section 12(1, Article 227 of the Constitution of India through a Writ Petition, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 12, Section 11, Section 18, Section 11, Section 12, Section 11, Section 12(1, Section 12(3, Section 12(3
PERSON: James, Palakkad, Palakkad, Mary Beena John v. Addl, B. Krishna Arjunan, Pochappan Narayanan v. Gopalan
GPE: I.A., I.A., I.A., I.A., law.5, KLT, I.A., I.A., I.A., I.A.
DATE: 1832/1993, R.C.A. 2/1993, R.C.A. 2/1993, 2600/1992, R.C.A. 2/1993, 1832 of 1993, 1986, 1996, 1979, 1990, fifteen days, '12, less than four weeks, less than two weeks, ' 9, 2600/1992, 1832, the year 1986
ORG: the Rent Control Appellate Authority, I.A. 2600/1992, the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, the Rent Control Court, the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Rules, Appellate, Court, the Rent Controller, the Appellant Authority, R.C.P., the Appellate Authority, Court, District Court, the Appellate Authority, the Appellate Authority, V.K. Ramaswamy, Ramaswamy, the Appellate Authority, Ramaswamy, the Rent Control Court, the Appellate Authority, the Rent Control Court, the Appellate Authority, the District Court, Court, Court, the Writ Petition, Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, the Rent Control Court, Court, the Rent Control Court, the Appellate Authority, The Appellate Authority
PRODUCT: R.C.P. 8/1986, Sections 12, Rule 13(3
NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules
CARDINAL: 2, 955, 18, 2, 1, 11(3, 11(4)(i, 18(1, 18(2, 1, 3, 2, 2, one, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, 4, 3, one, 32,450/-
EVENT: KLT SN Page 71