Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kuriachan Chacko, Vs. State of Kerala

Decided On : Jul-19-2007

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 2(c, Section 420, Section 2(e, Section 420, Section 482, Section 239/240 of the Cr., Section 2(c, Section 420, the R.B.I. Act, Section 2(c, Section 420, Section 2(e, Section 239, Section 2(e, Section 3, Section 239/240 of the Cr., Section 173, Section 240, Section 173, Chapter, Section 239, Section 240, Section 244, Chapter, Section 239, Section 245(1, Section 239, Section 239/240 of the Cr., Section 420, Section 2(c, Section 415, Section 420, Section 2(c, Section 2(c, Section 2(c, Section 2(c, Section 3, Section 2(c, Section 2(c, Section 4, Section 420, Section 2(c, Section 2(e, Section 2(e, Section 2(e, Section 2(e, Section 2(e, Section 482, Section 149

ORG: ORDERR, the Indian Parliament, State, Sections 3, Sections 3, State, the Reserve Bank of India Act, Bar, Special Public Prosecutor/Additional Advocate General, Scheme, the Kerala State Government, Government, the Inspector General of Police, IPC, Court, Nos.12775, the Investigating Officer.10, Sections, IPC, Magistrate, IPC, Secstions 3, State, Additional Advocate General, the Special Public Prosecutor, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 239, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the two Sections, Sections 227, Court, the LIS Deepasthambham Scheme/Project, Reliance, Court, W.P., Court, Nos.12775 & 13152/06, the Division Bench, the Division Bench, the LIS Deepasthambham Scheme/Project, Scheme, Scheme, Suffice, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, IPC, Sections 3, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, IPC, State, State, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme, State, Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, Reliance, Sharp, Sections 3 and 4 of the Act, C.J.M., IPC, Sections 3, State, Additional Advocate General/Special Prosecutor, Additional Advocate General, the LIS Deepasthambham Scheme, State, Sections 3, The Inspector General of Police, the State Legislature, the Inspector General of Police, State, State, Magistrate

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble

WORK_OF_ART: The Prize, Chits & Money Circulation Scheme (Banning) Act, Scheme, Scheme, Scheme', Scheme' in Section 2(c

DATE: 1978, 4, 4, the next 35 weeks, one year, 1,250/-, 1,250/-, 35 weeks, the period of one year, 35 weeks, 35 weeks, 5/7/2006, 4, 4, 4, para-18, para-18, 4, 1250/-, 1,093.75, 1,093.75, 35 months, 1 + 2 + 4 + 8), the initial days, injury.34, 4, 4

CARDINAL: six, 5, 5, one, 350/-, 35, 10/-, 5,000/-, 35, 5,000/-, 35, 10/-, 14, 450, 1377/06, 2(e, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 240, 1, 2, 239, 240, three, 245(1)/246, 1, 245(1, 1, 1, 14, 228, 239, 240, 245(1, 246, 228, 239, 240, 245(1, 246, three, two, 2912/05, 33743/05, 5/7/06, two, 16/11/02, 5, 180.50, 24.25, 156.25, 98/-, 10.50, 82.50, 13.95, 180.50, 24.25, 625, 468.75Deficit, 1250 - 156.25, 468.75, 1982CriLJ819, 1982CriLJ819, 1,250/-, 14, two, two, two, four, two, 15, 14, 1982CriLJ819, between two or, one, 3 and 4, 14, 14, 14, one, 5, one, 39, 5, one, at least one, one

PERSON: Judicial Magistrate, Ernakulam, Thrikalam, 625/-, Rs, Thrikalam, V.K. Bali, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Paul, Peter, Peters, 625/-, 625/- Rs, 625/-, 625/-, Rs, Chandrachud, Swapan, Kumar Guha, Swapan, Kumar Guha, 625/-, Sri, M.K. Damodaran, Swapan, Kumar Guha, Kumar Guha, Kumar Guha, Law, Peter, interpretation.37, fail.40

GPE: Act.3, P.C., determination:(i, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Crl, Swapan, Swapan, P.C., P.C.

PERCENT: 28%, 25%, 30%, 25%, 28%, 30%, 350/- 28%, 3%, 25%, 275/- 30%, 5%, 25%

ORDINAL: third, first, third, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, 14th, first, third

PRODUCT: Sections 227, LIS Deepasthambam, Act.33

TIME: the minutes

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //