Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner

Decided On : May-22-2006

Court : Kerala

LAW: the Companies Act, Section 5(3, the K.G.S.T. Act, Section 45A, the K.G.S.T. Act, Section 45A, the K.G.S.T. Act, Section 5(3, the K.G.S.T. Act, Section 45A, the K.G.S.T. Act, Section 45, the K.G.S.T. Act, Section 45A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 2(xii, the K.G.S.T. Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 45A, the K.G.S.T. Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 45A, Constitution, Chapter 5, Chapter 9, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the K.G.S.T. Act

PERSON: K. Balakrishnan Nair, Exts, Exts, Exts, Exts, Exts, Malayala Manorama, Exts, Counsel Shri, Carl Stilgmbh v. State of Bihar, Whirlpool Corporation, Cochin, Raju Joseph, J., K.S.Paripoornan, J., De Smith, Woolf, William Wade, Administrative Law, N.Parthasarathy v. Controller of Capital Issues(l99l)Z SCC 153, A. P., Kumar Chadha, Bench, Sethi, R.P. Kapur, Mathew, J., Baid, Dennan, Bolton, Reid, Pearce, Mathew, De Smith, Woolf, Woolf, Jowell, Q.C., Vires, Law, Pearlman, Kanubhai Brambhatt v. State

NORP: J.1, Malay, Indian, R.

DATE: daily, the 1st, Form 18, Form 18, the assessment year 2000-01, Form 18, seven days, the financial years 2001-02,2002-03, 2003-04, 2000, 19.01.2006, 27.01.2006, 16.02.2006, 15.03.2006, D.P.Dube 1963, 1983, 1994, 1968, 1973, 1980, 1995, 1980, 1981, 1981, 1985, 1989, 1994, 1989, ten years old, nearly ten years, 14 years, 2004, 1011, 2004, a few weeks back

EVENT: K.G.S.T.

PERCENT: 3%, 3%

ORG: State, Ext, P3, PS, P10, Pll, P10, Pll, Court, Court, the Writ Petition, the Writ Petition, Mathai, the Apex Court, Court, Court, Bhopal Sugar Industries Ltd., Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd, Registrar of Trade Marks, State of Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd., the High Court, the Apex Court, Collector of Customs and Excise, Agricultural Income Tax, Tata Tea Ltd., STC, the Writ Petition, the Writ Petition, Special Government Pleader (Taxes, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the House of Lords, Anisminic, The Foreign Compensation Commission, Lordship, Illuri Subbayya Chetty, Anisminic Ltd., Foreign Compensation Commission, Anisminic, Jowell - Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Animinic, Court, Tarachand Gupta & Bros, Durga Prasad, Das v. Settlement Commission, the Judgment of, ML, Judgment, Anisminic, Anisminic Ltd., Foreign Compensation Commission, Anisminic Ltd., Parliament, Parliament, the House of Lords, Hart Prasad Mulshanker Trivedi, the House of Lords, Anisminic, Anisminic, S.A.Smith'Judicial Review of Administrative Action, 2nd Edn., S. A.De Smith, 3rd Edn, Jowell -Judicial Review of Administrative Action - 5th Edn, Anisminic, House, Privy Council, the House of Lords wherein Anisminic, Racal Communications Ltd., O'Reilly v. Mackman 1983, Hull University, Anisminic, the High Court, AC 374, the House of Lords, Council of Civil Service Unions, the Civil Service, AC 374, the House of Lords, Privy Council, De Smith, Judicial Review of Administrative Action, Anisminic, Raced Communications, Parliament, C.F.Forsyth, Anisminic, the Summary of Rules, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, the High Court, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Union of India v., Hindalco Industries, the Apex Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Sales Tax, Louis Dreyfuss India Limited, the Writ Petition, the Writ Petition, Court

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

CARDINAL: 14,66,256/-, 01.04.2000, 01.04.2000, P9, P9, 6, P9, 30.03.2006.6, 14, 410, 1962]2SCR81, 1961]41ITR191(SC, 142, 1, 1973ECR18(SC, 127, 6, 6, 861, 1967(2, 986, 1997(89)ELT247(SC, one, 238, 114, 67, 9, 299.The, 1988CriLJ1661, 1989]176ITR169(SC, 1991]2SCR924, two, 1973]1SCR697, 10 and 11, 1974]1SCR548, 2608, 423-24, 28).Though, two, 394, one, 98, 112, 229, three, 2, three, four, 5, 256, two, 1, 1, 113, 1, 2, 3, 4, 121-122).337, 284, 320, 319, 2, 310, tens of thousands, tens of thousands, 2003(153)ELT481(SC, 1, 1, 571

GPE: Pll.4, K.S.Paripoornan, Dhulabhai, Halsbury, Reissue, pp, Gujarat, phobia

FAC: the Writ Petition, the Writ Petition on merits.8, the Writ Petition, 4th Edn, Halsbury Laws of England

WORK_OF_ART: Judgment in Mafattal Industries v. Union of India, Fact and Law'

PRODUCT: Judgment, R.S.Nayak, Judgment