Collector of Central Excise Vs. Subramanyan and Co.

Decided On : Jan-27-1994

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 4, Rule 8, Tariff it, Section 4

CARDINAL: 1, 7.2.1986, 68, 120/75, 68, 37, 369, 35, 289, 37, 369, 120/75, 120/75, 120/75, 68, 68, 37, 369, 10, 8), 120/75, 9, 3, 35, 289, 10, 11, 34, 563, 6, 14, 10

ORG: The Collector of Central Excise, the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals, M/s. Subrahmanyan and Company, the Central Excises &, Central Excise, JDR, JDR, Texmaco Limited v., SC, JDR, Supreme Court, Burn Standard Co. Ltd., v. Union of India 1991, SC, the Central Excises &, the Supreme Court, Texmaco Limited v., SC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Municipal Committee Malkapur, the Bombay High Court, Ramesh Occhaulal Shah v. Union of India 1993, Central Government, the Central Excises &, the Central Board of Excise &, Customs, undertaking.10, the Supreme Court, Texmaco Limited v., SC, Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Standard Co. Ltd., Anr., Union of India, SC, Tribunal, Collector of Central Excise, Tribunal, MCI, Tribunal, MCI, Tribunal, Taxmaco Ltd., Tribunal, Tribunal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court

PERSON: Vadodara, Mono Block, Salt Act, Tariff, Shri Willingdon Christian, Shri A.K. Singhal, Salt Act, Shri Willingdon Christian, Railways, Ballabhdas Mathuradas Lakhani, Bombay).6, Railways, Tariff, Salt Act, Shri Subba Rao, Mani Bhai, Calcutta, Mani Bhai

DATE: 1944, 1944, 30.4.1975, 44, 44, 30.4.1975, 30.4.1975, 1944, 1944 1, at least 7 days, 9, 1991, 21.8.1990, 1991

NORP: Central Excise, sic)1944

WORK_OF_ART: 8.12.1993, Collector of Central Excise 1991, Collector of Central Excise 1991, Collector of Central Excise 1991, Collector of Central Excise,

GPE: Assessee, Brothers