Deputy Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax and Sales Tax Vs. Sherneilly Rubber and Cardamom Estates Ltd. and ors.

Decided On : Nov-09-1960

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 2(i, Section 3, Section 3, Section 2(i, Section 2(i).5, a Central Act, Section 54, the Criminal Law Amendment Act, Article 304(a, Section 2(i, Article 304(a, Section 2(i, Article 304(a, Article 304(a).9, Article 304, Article 304 of the Constitution indicates, Constitution, Article 304 of the Constitution, Article 304(a, Article 304(a, Constitution, Article 304, Article 304(a, Article 304(a, Constitution, Article 304(a, Constitution, Section 297, Government of India Act, Section 2(i

PERSON: M.A. Ansari, Ayalur, T.R.C., T.R.C., Kuzhithurai, Gwyer, S. K. Das, Charusila Dasi, Siddiq v. M. B. State, Rajasthan, Nevaskar, J., Rajasthan, Articles 301, Automobiles v. State of Assam A.I.R., Pleader

DATE: C.J. 1, the assessment year 1953-54, 1939, T.R.C. 8/58, T.R.C. 9/58, 1953-54, each year, such year, 1959, 1891, 1956, 1960, 1960, 1960, 1935, 1955, 1958

CARDINAL: four, 69,122-7-4, 3,26,921, 5,108-2-3, 2,80,682-7-4, 4,385-10-8, 12/58, 29,121, 455, three, 1, two, 2, 1, three, 4, 75, 6., 1010.:It, 218, 11, 173, 304, 11, 337, 11, 511, 517, 1, two, One, 2, one, 624, 9, 772, four

ORG: Agricultural Income Tax, Sales Tax, the Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, Cardamom Estates Ltd., the Travancore-Cochin State, Messrs Sivalokam Estate, Nagercoil, the Travancore-Cochin State, Messrs Kamadhenu Estate, M/s. Peirce Leslie & Co. Ltd., Messrs Dunlop Rubber Co., Ltd.3, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, The Appellate Tribunal, a State Legislature, State, the State Legislature, Tribunal, Advocate-General, Hindu Women's Rights, the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Dominion, the Judicial Committee, Advocate-General, State of Bihar v. Sm, Legislature, Legislature, Madeod, A.C. 455, Legislature, the State Legislature, the State Legislatures, State, the Madras Legislature, Travancore-Cochin, Travancore-Cochin State, Legislature, M.B. 214, Uttar Pradesh, the State of Madhya Bharat, follows:-The, State, Learned Advocate-General, Uttar Pradesh, State, Legislature, Abdul Subhan & Co., State, State, State, State, State, State, Madhya Pradesh, Advocate-General, the State Legislature, State, State, State, State, the State of Assam, the Appellate Tribunal, Travancore-Cochin, Legislature, Tribunal, the Madras General Sales Tax Act, Legislature, A.I.T. & S.T. v. Raman, India Coffee & Tea Distributing Co., Ltd., follows:-The

FAC: Fort Cochin, the Madras State, Fort Cochin, Fort Cochin, Fort Cochin, Fort Cochin, Fort Cochin

LOC: the Madras State, the Madras State, the Madras State, the Madras State, the Madras State, the Madras State, the Madras State

GPE: Kuzhithurai, Messrs, Trivandrum, A.I.R., A.I.R., Australia, the United States of America, States, Mohd, States, States, Madhya, States, States, recovered.10, Subalal v. State, Bhailal, Bhai v. State of, States, States, Madras State, Tribunal.12

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second

EVENT: S.C. 1002

PRODUCT: Colony

NORP: Bharat, contra, Indian