Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Business India Builders and Developers Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India and ors.

Decided On : Feb-19-2007

Court : Kerala

LAW: the Securitisation Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Securitisation Act and Rules, the Securitisation Act, Securitisation Act, the Securitisation Act, Rule 8, the Securitisation Act, the Securitisation Act, the Securitisation Act, the Companies Act, Section 35, Section 37, the Securitisation Act, Section 37, the Securitisation Act, Section 46-B of the State Financial Corporation Act, Section 35, the Securitisation Act, the Securitisation Act, the Securitisation Act, Securitisation Act, Section 13, Section 14

PERSON: K.S. Radhakrishnan, Actg, Sri, D. Kishore, Sri, A.V. Thomas, Ernakulam, Annex

ORG: Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002, Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest, Bank, the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control, the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control, Court, SN, Bench, the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules 2002.3, the Mavelikara Branch, the Union Bank of India, the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Tribunal, Notice, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the District Magistrate, the District Magistrate, the Security Interest Enforcement Rules, Bank, M/s. Anupam, the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control, Supreme Court, Mardia Chemicals, the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control, the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, the Securities and Exchange Board, the Recovery of Debts Due to, Court, SN, Court, Court, the State Financial Corporation Act, Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control, Court, the Slate Financial Corporation Act, the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control, the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control, the Rent Control Act.6, Bank, the Rent Control Act, Bank, Bench, Haryana High Court, Kalyani Sales Co. v. Union of India

DATE: 2002, 2002, 2005, 20/ 35, 27-9-2002, 2-9-2003, 2002, 19-9-2004, 6-7-2006, 9-8-2006, 9-8-2006, 1956, 1 of 1956, 1956, 42 of 1956, 1992, 15 of 1992, 1993, 51 of 1993, 2005, 1951

CARDINAL: 31-10-2006, 4, 70, 9(9, 35,00,000/-, 30,00,000/-, 8.86, 20/37, 12, 279/03, 1232/04, 21, 5, 2, 25-8-04, 13, 1, 2, 20, 35, 37, 4, 70

GPE: Shameem v. City Police, KLT, India, Mavelikara Village, IA, Shameem v. City Police, KLT, Antony

ORDINAL: first, 5th

MONEY: 20.500 cents

WORK_OF_ART: R2 Declaration

TIME: 20-1-95

PRODUCT: Rule 9(9

NORP: Punjab

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //