Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Varkey Vs. Paily Issac
Decided On : Apr-11-2003
Court : Kerala
LAW: Section 69, Section 82 of the Act, Rule 99, Rule 98 of the Rules, Rule 98 of the Rules, Rule 98 of the Rules, Rule 100(3, Section 82, Section 82, Order 41 Rule 1, Section 82 of the Act, Rule 98, Rule 100(3
PERSON: Cyriac Joseph, J.1, George Poonthottam, Monaye, Memorandum, Rule, Pleader, Headquarters, Headquarters, Headquarters, Pleader, Vakalath, ko, Vakalath
GPE: O.P., LA, 419/2002, LA, LA, Tribunal, Trivandrum, C.P.C.
DATE: 35551/2002, 11.12.2002, 26.12.1999, 35551/2002, thus:'98(1)(a, today the.......day of.........19, Rule 98.'7, today, 2002, a period of, three months
LOC: Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single Judge
ORG: the Board of Directors, the Kothamangalam Service Co-operative, Bank, the Board of Directors, the Kerala Co-operative, Tribunal, A.P. No, the Board of Directors, Tribunal, Tribunal, O.P. No, the Original Petition, Tribunal, the Kerala Co-operative Societies Rules, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Original, the Tribunal under Sub-section, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Sub-section, the Kerala Co-operativeTribunal, Sd/-)(Appellant(s)/Authorised Representatives, Sd/-)(Appellant(s)/Authorised Representatives, Tribunal, the Tribunal on the day, Sub-rule(2, the Kerala Co-operative, Tribunal, the Kerala Co-operative, Societies Rules, A.P. No, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, PS, Tribunal, Tribunal, Board of Directors, Ext, Tribunal, I.A. Nos, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Rule 100(3, Tribunal
CARDINAL: 76/2002, 6.11.2002, one, one, only one, 1, 15, 15, 1 to 10, 2, 1, 10, 1, 15, 1, 10, 1, 15, 15, 19, 2, 4., 5, 6, 99, 1, 2, 3, 15, 15, 1, 76/2002, 1, 10, 15, 15, 1 to 10, 1, 10, 100(1)(c, 3, 100, 19, 415, 419
NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, I.As, Rules
FAC: the Headquarters of the Tribunal
ORDINAL: first