K.O. Daniel, Merchant, Kayamqulam Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore

Decided On : Feb-02-1960

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 66(1, Section 66(1

GPE: Ansari

NORP: J.1, -0These

CARDINAL: two, 16-8-1950, 31-3-1952, 6,737, 24,128, 3-9-1951, three, 24.128, three, 6,993, 5,295, 0, 5,105-, 6,735, 0-0, 24,128, three, 17-8-1950, three, four, 6993-14, 24,128, 24.159, three, one, two, 1, 24.128-14, 24.128-14, 1958]34ITR807(SC, 1957]31ITR28(SC, one, 1959]37ITR151(SC, One, 1957]32ITR56(All, 24,128, three, 3-9-1951, 24.128-14, 15, 16, 15thparagraph

DATE: year 1952-53, the period of 191/2 months, the year, the earlier year, August 1951, an year, 3215, another year, 1950, the prior accounting year, the accounting year, the earlier assessment year, some days, 3-9-1951

PERSON: i. e., Alleppey Circle, K. S. Baby, K. S George, K. S. Baby, Kuttiyil Varghese, Venkatarama Aiyyar, J., N. J. Naidu v. Commr, Mohammed Idrees Barry, Pleader

ORG: Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate, home'.2, Tribunal, Govindaraiulu Mudaliar, Court, Kumaraswamy Reddiar, Tribunal, the Appellata Tribunal, Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd, the Supreme Court, Omar Salay Mohammed Sait, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, High Courts, Co, Kanpur Steel Co. Ltd., the Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, The Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, Department, Court, Tribunal, Court, theAppellate Tribunal, Department

QUANTITY: 3-9-1951

WORK_OF_ART: 'Other Sources'.(2

ORDINAL: first, second