Kay Cee Electricals Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Jan-13-2003

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 132, Section 158BC, Section 132(4, Section 158B(b, Section 132(4, Section 271, section 158B(b, Section 132(4).He, Chapter XIV-B, Chapter XIV-B, Section 271(1)(c, Section 158B(b).10, Chapter XIV-B, Section 271(1)(c, Section 158B(b, Section 132(4, Section 132(4, Section 158B(b).12, Section 158B(b, Section 132(4, Section 158B(b, Section 132(4A, section 132(5, Section 132(4, ITR 11, Section 114, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 110 of the Evidence Act.17, Section 132(4A, Section 132(4

CARDINAL: 1, 36,46,545, 19, 19, 15, 15, three, one, 15, 27,27,052, 2, 10, 19, 15, 2, 36,46,545, 5, 1)(c, 27, 15,16,037, 5, 5, 5, One, 5, 36, two, 19, 39, 250, 77, 1, 82, 19, 9, 15, 30,06,400, 24,518, 30,06,400, 9,200, 10, 2, 19, three, 9,200, 15, 3,95,000, 3, 3,95,000, 10, 57, 57, 400, 60, 18, 57, one, 254, 172, 18, 19, 36, 36, three, 27,27,052, 10, 2, 10, 19, 9, 15, 2, 2, 2, 15, 23, 24,518, 9,200, 20,71,000, 3,95,000, 3, 15, 40,76,001, 2,43,000, 3,95,000, 2,38,000, 50,200, 21,04,718, 24,518, 9,26,000, 3,95,000, 3, 15, 3,95,000, 15, two, 15, 70, two, two, two, two, 5,85,000, 1 lac, 21,04,718+Rs, 6,85,000, two, 15, 50,200, 50,200, 36,45,575, 10, 69,373, 11, 48,400, 22, 25,411, 4.37, 1,35,000, 150, 26.7, 10,000, 2,09, 841.27, 67, 67, 150

DATE: 1st April, 1985 to 24th Aug., 1995, 24th Aug., 1995, the current year, Aug., 1996, Aug., 1996, 9200, 3, 16, the previous year, the period 1st April, 1995 to 23rd Aug., 1995, 1996-97, 24th Aug., 1995, 30th June, 95, year, the previous year, the previous year, the period 1st April, 1985 to 23rd Aug., 1995, the previous year, 1996-97, the period ending 23rd Aug., 95, 1991, 2001, 2002, 2002, the date of 21st Aug., 1995, Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, the current year's, 1965, 1965, 1966, 1965, 2002, 1872, 1988, year, 3, 16, 18, 21, 21st Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, the date of 21st Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, odd up to 21st, Aug., 1995, Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, Aug., 1995, Aug., 1995, 21st Aug., 1995, such year

ORG: CIT, AO, Sections 68, AO, J.K.Aggarwal, Shashi Metal, AO, AO, AO, AO, Department, yr.1996, Departmental Representative, Department, AO, AO, Tribunal, ITO, ITD 183, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, CIT, Tribunal, CTT, TTJ, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, AO, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Parimisetti Seetharamamma v., CIT, SC, the Supreme Court, CIT, Chari &amp, Chari Ltd., the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT v. Best &amp, Co., P) Ltd., SC, Bar, CIT, Chari &amp, Chari, SC, Court, Court, Department, Revenue, The Hon'ble Delhi High Court, CIT v. Motor General Finance Ltd., ITR, The Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, SC, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal, S/Shri V.M. Sushil J. Sunil J. and, Ved Metal, J.K. Aggarwal, 36,65,718, AO, AO, AO, AO, pp., AO, AO, AO, Department, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, yr.1996, AO, AO, AO, AO

GPE: New Delhi.2, B-7, Delhi, Greece, Madhu, assessee, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Expln, Daya Chand, Rawat

PERSON: Jhilmil, Shahdara, Jhilmil, Shahdara, Jhilmil, Shahdara, J.K. Aggarwal, Jhilmil, Shahdara, Jhilmil Shahdara, Slip, Jhilmil, Shahdara, Vinod Tempo, Ved Metal, 1,00,33,970, Jhilmil, Shahdara, wherein, Chapter XIV-B, Chapter XIV-B, Aggarwal, .secret, Aggarwal, almirah, Jhilmil, Shahdara, S.P. Goel v. Dy, 71,06,918, 71,06,918, Jhilmil Shahdara, Sushil J. Since, Nos, 71,06,918, S.P. Goel, Sushil J., Sushil J., Slip, Sushil J., Ved Metal, Rawat, 1,00,33,970

PRODUCT: Section 158BF, Kumar, 327

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly, Third, Firstly, first, first, first

NORP: Ashwani, Ashwani, Chuharmal, Ashwani, Ashwani, Ashwani

LOC: Sushil

QUANTITY: 20,71,000 + Rs, 9,200 + Rs