Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Assistant Collector, Central Excise, Vs. T.T. Pylunny, Prop : Royal Smiths

Decided On : Jan-16-1979

Court : Kerala

LAW: Rule 11, Section 36 of the Act, Rules 10 and 11, Chapter III, Chapter VII-A, Rule 8, Rule 11

PERSON: Gopalan Nambiyar, Ernakulam, Madras, Exts, Kunnamkulam

ORG: the Appellate Collector, the Union of India, O.P. No, Royal Smiths, Ext, Ext, Appellate, Ext, Ext, Central Government, the Central Excises & Salt Act, unnecessary).6, Ext, the Assistant Collector, the Appellate Collector in, Ext, Ext

CARDINAL: 124, 24.9.1969, 1,44,241.50, 2, 173-3, 13.11.1972, 3, 4, 6, 11, 173, 11, 40, 1, fifty thousand, two, fifty, 2, two, 50,000/., 50,000/-, 2, 13.11.1972, 4, 6, 124

DATE: 1975, Between 2.4.1969, 29.3.1971, 22.7.1972, 27.6.1973, 12.8.1974.3, the last date of the year, three months, three months, three months', one year', 1944, 1944, the first day of April, any financial year, any financial year, any such year, one year, the year, the year, the year, the year, the year, the year, 1975, 16th January, 1979

NORP: Rules, Rules

GPE: Jugde, O.P.

ORDINAL: first

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //