Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income Tax Officer Vs. Subhash Synthetics

Decided On : Sep-30-2002

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

LAW: Section 145(2, the Excise Act, the IT Act, Excise Act, the IT Act, the Companies Act, Section 145(2, the IT Act, Section 145(2).8, Section 145(2, Section 145

CARDINAL: 1, 6,28,174, 5,00,066, 25, 4 to 6, as many as 618, only 10 to, 1, 25, 25, more than half, only 25, 618, 25, 6, 25, 618, 3, 5, 42, 245, 25, 249, 73.53, 69, 255, 62.55, 58, 257, 57, 61.53, tallies, 25

DATE: 28th June, 1996, 1993, the year, 13,05,606.4, the beginning of every year, a year, the year, the year, the entire year, the year, 1992, 1997, the year, the previous two years, the year, 1992-93, the year, the year, two years

PERSON: Ajmer, Ajmer, Bhilwara, Schedule IV, Jaipur Bench

ORG: AO, AO, Central, Central, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, AO, Central, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, ITO, Rupal Chem Dyes &amp, Metals Sales Corporation, TTJ, AO, AO, AO, Asstt, CIT, Tax World, AO, AO, AO, Central, AO, AO, AO, AO

MONEY: 2.67 per cent, 0.74 per cent, 0.74 per cent, 2.67 per cent, 2.67 per cent, 0.74 per cent, 0.62 per cent, 0.46 per cent, 0.74 per cent, 2.67 per cent, 2.67 per cent, 2.67 per cent

GPE: C.A.

FAC: Sona Textiles

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //