Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Jose Kuruvilla Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax
Decided On : Aug-28-1991
Court : Kerala
LAW: Section 5, Section 5(1, Explanation 1, section 10(5
PERSON: K.S. Paripoornan, Kozhikode, Rs
NORP: J.1, Indian
ORG: Sales Tax, The Agricultural Income-tax Officer, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, Sales Tax (Appeals, the Kerala Agricultural Income-tax Rules, State, the Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Calcutta High Court, CIT, Kamala Mills Ltd., Dharampur Leather Cloth Co. Ltd., CIT, the Bombay High Court, the Agricultural Income-tax Act, Registrar
DATE: the assessment years 1979-80, 1980-81, year 1982-83, March 31, 1982, this assessment year, November 29, 1978, this year, 1982-83, the previous years, 1978-79, the previous year 1982-83, 1981-82, the assessment years 1979-80, 1980-81, 1981-82, the assessment year 1982-83, 1950, the previous year, the previous year, the previous year, November 29, 1978, the previous year, the previous years, four years, the previous years, 1951, '13, the previous year, 1950, 1951, 1950, 1950, the previous year, the previous year, 1949]17ITR130(Cal, the previous year, 1922, the prior years, year 1955-56, every year, every year, the previous year, those years, 1950, the previous year, the assessment years 1979-80, 1980-81
PRODUCT: KRD 57, year1982-83, Calcutta
CARDINAL: 38,256, 19,039, 3,808, 1,904, 3, 5, 1, 13, 13, 13, 1965]55ITR329(Bom, 336
MONEY: 20 per cent, 50 per cent
GPE: Bombay, Kerala, Trivandrum