Semantic Analysis by spaCy
George Paul Puthuran Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Decided On : Jan-25-1980
Court : Kerala
LAW: Section 256(2, the I.T. Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 147, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Section 28, Section 30, Section 4, Section 30, Section 28, the Central Act, Section 28
PERSON: Balakrishna Eradi, Cochin Bench, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, Gopalan Nambiyar, Virendra Singh
GPE: O.P., M. Jairam v., Addl
DATE: 1975, 1961, 1970-71, the year 1961, June 9, 1961, November 9, 1961, 28th October, 1968, November 9, 1969, the assessment year 1971-72, that year, 1971-72, that year, August 17, 1969, November 9, 1969, the year 1971-72, June 9, 1961, August 16, 1969, the assessment year 1970-71.4, 1970-71, December 14, 1972, the assessment year 1970-71, the assessment year 1970-71, August 17, 1968, August 16, 1969, 1970-71, November, 1969, the assessment year, the assessment year, 1970-71, 1975
ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, the Kerala Land Acquisition Act, the Cochin Shipyard Project, the Land Acquisition Officer, Court, State, ITO, State, AAC, State, AAC, AAC, ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, AAC, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Section 256(1, Tribunal, O.P. No., Tribunal, Tribunal, High Courts, Division, the Allahabad High Court, CIT, the Allahabad High Court, Registrar, Tribunal
CARDINAL: 2, 1,21,554, 2, 2,59,750, 1,25,183, 1,25,183, 3,629, 1,21,554, 1,21,554, 1,21,554, 1,21,554, 15,585, 1,21,554, two, two, 1979]117ITR638(Ker, one, 1979]118ITR923(All, 1, 2
QUANTITY: 1 acre
MONEY: 83 cents, 570 per cent
PERCENT: 6%