Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

George Paul Puthuran Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Jan-25-1980

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 256(2, the I.T. Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 147, the I.T. Act, the I.T. Act, Section 28, Section 30, Section 4, Section 30, Section 28, the Central Act, Section 28

PERSON: Balakrishna Eradi, Cochin Bench, Ernakulam, Ernakulam, Gopalan Nambiyar, Virendra Singh

GPE: O.P., M. Jairam v., Addl

DATE: 1975, 1961, 1970-71, the year 1961, June 9, 1961, November 9, 1961, 28th October, 1968, November 9, 1969, the assessment year 1971-72, that year, 1971-72, that year, August 17, 1969, November 9, 1969, the year 1971-72, June 9, 1961, August 16, 1969, the assessment year 1970-71.4, 1970-71, December 14, 1972, the assessment year 1970-71, the assessment year 1970-71, August 17, 1968, August 16, 1969, 1970-71, November, 1969, the assessment year, the assessment year, 1970-71, 1975

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal, the Kerala Land Acquisition Act, the Cochin Shipyard Project, the Land Acquisition Officer, Court, State, ITO, State, AAC, State, AAC, AAC, ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, AAC, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Section 256(1, Tribunal, O.P. No., Tribunal, Tribunal, High Courts, Division, the Allahabad High Court, CIT, the Allahabad High Court, Registrar, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 2, 1,21,554, 2, 2,59,750, 1,25,183, 1,25,183, 3,629, 1,21,554, 1,21,554, 1,21,554, 1,21,554, 15,585, 1,21,554, two, two, 1979]117ITR638(Ker, one, 1979]118ITR923(All, 1, 2

QUANTITY: 1 acre

MONEY: 83 cents, 570 per cent

PERCENT: 6%

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //