Skip to content

Dda Vs. M/S Kenneth Builders Developers Ltd. and Ors - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-29-2016

Court: Supreme Court of India

LAW: a Division Bench, Section 56, the Indian Contract Act, the Development Agreement, the Water Act, the Air Act, the EIA Notification, the EIA Notification, Forest Conservation Act, Pollution) Act, Section 4, the Master Plan (MPD-2001, the Master Plan, the Water Act, the Air Act, the Air Act, the Water Act, the Air Act and Water Act, section 21, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Air Act, the Water Act, Section 56, the Indian Contract Act, the Contract Act, Section 56 of the Contract Act, Section 56, the Contract Act, Section 56, the Contract Act, Section 56, the Indian Contract Act, the Development Agreement, Section 56, the Contract Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDCITION CIVIL APPEAL No.5370, S.L.P., Delhi Development Authority, S.L.P., Delhi Development Authority, the High Court, DDA, the High Court, DDA, the High Court, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee, DPCC, DDA, the National Capital Territory, GNCTD, Department of Forests, DDA, the National Capital Territory, DDA, DDA, the Delhi Pollution Control Committee, DDA, DDA, the Ministry of Urban Development of the Government of India, DDA, DDA, the Delhi Development Authority, DDA, the Planning Department, DDA, inter alia, State, the Central Government, follows:“6, MCD, Delhi Jal Board, Delhi Fire Services, State, Central Government, Authority, Contract, State, Central Government, Contract, MCD, Delhi Jal Board, Delhi Fire Services, State, Central Government, Authority, Authority, the Development Agreement, DDA office, the Department of Forests, GNCTD, the Department of Forests, DDA, GNCTD, DDA, GNCTD, the Ridge Management Board, Court, the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India, DPCC, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, M/s, Kenneth Builders &, EIA, EMP, the Expert Appraisal Committee, 1st & 3rd, The Expert Committee, Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, Delhi Pollution Control Committee, the Environmental (Protection) Act, Fire Department, Civil Aviation Department, Wildlife (Protection) Act, Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, the Air (Prevention, the Environment (Protection) Act, the Public Liability (Insurance) Act, EIA Notification, Supreme Court of, Goa Foundation v. Union of India, DPCC, DPCC, DDA, GNCTD, M/s, Kenneth Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., DPCC, Delhi Pollution Control Committee, Government of National Capital Territory of, the Preamble of the, Delhi Government, DDA, District Part, Project, the Forest Department, The Ministry of Environment & Forest, Delhi Pollution Control Committee, DDA, Project, the Environment Clearance, Delhi Pollution Control Committee, DPCC, inter alia, The High Court, DDA, DDA, DDA, DDA, DDA, DPCC, DDA, DPCC, DDA, DDA, DPCC, the Department of Forests, Government of NCT, DPCC, the Department of Forests, the Government of NCT, the Department of Forests, DPCC, the Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India.27, DDA, the High Court, DDA, DDA, DPCC, DPCC, DDA, the High Court, DDA, DDA, The High Court, DPCC, GNCTD, the Department of Forests, DPCC, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, WP, Writ Petition (C, Kenneth Builders and Developers Ltd., UOI & Ors, the High Court, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Ministry of Environment and Forests, DDA, Hon’ble Supreme Court, Apex Court, Central Empowered Committee, Supreme Court, Court, the Ministry of Environment and Forests, the Central Empowered Committee, DDA, the Delhi High Court, DDA, DPCC, GNCTD, the Department of Forests, the Delhi High Court, DDA, the Delhi High Court, DPCC, the Delhi High Court, DPCC, the Ridge Management Board, Court, the Department of Forests, the Department of Forests, the Delhi High Court, Court, Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, KENNETH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT., MAA ANANDMAYI MARG, TEHKHAND, Consent to Estab, I.D. No.25891, Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, u/s 25/26 of the Water (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, Residential Construction Project, DDA, Conservator of Forest, DDA, Conservator of Forest, the Ridge Management Board, the Consent Management Committee (Orange, Conservator of Forest, Forest Clearance, DPCC, DDA, the Competent Authorities, the Ridge Management Board &, Supreme Court, the Ridge Management Board &, Supreme Court, DDA, Conservator of Forest, Conservator of Forest, Conservator of Forest, High Court, DPCC, the Water & Air Acts, the Consent Management Committee (Orange, the Forest Deptt, the Forest Department, the Consent Management Committee (Orange, 1.10.10 &, Committee, Air & Water Acts, Residential Construction Project, the Air & Water Acts, DDA, Court, Additional Solicitor General, the High Court, the Central Empowered Committee, Court, the Central Empowered Committee, CEC, T.N.Godavarman v. Union of India[2], CEC, the Ridge Management Board, Court, the Delhi High Court, Ashok Kumar Tanwar, W.P., the Ridge Management Board, DDA, the Ridge Management Board, Court, CEC, follows:“6, the Ridge Management Board, Court, Court, the Ridge Management Board Fund, the Delhi Ridge Management Board, Court, Shri Ashok, Writ Petition (Civil) No.3339 of, the Directorate General, Border Road Organisation, Ministry of Defence at Naraina, Court, The Government of NCT, the Delhi Ridge Management Board, the Border Road Organisation, the Delhi Ridge Management Board, Court, CEC, the Delhi Ridge Management Board, the Border Road Organisation, the Delhi Ridge Management Board, CEC, Court, Court, Delhi Metro Rail Corporation, Court, ANNEXURE-R-4, the Delhi Forest Department, the Forest Department, CEC, CEC, the Forest Department, DDA, ANNEXURE-R-7, the Ridge Management Board, Court, the Border Road Organisation, Court, CEC, the Ridge Management Board, Court, DDA, the High Court, Court, DDA, DPCC, DPCC, DPCC, DPCC, DPCC, DDA, DPCC, DPCC, the High Court, DPCC, GNCTD, DDA, the Ministry of Urban Development of the Government of India, the Department of Forests, GNCTD, DDA, GNCTD, GNCTD, Satyabrata Ghose, Mugneeram Bangur & Co.[3, Court, Court, DDA, the Government of India, DDA, the Ministry of Urban Development, DDA, the Ridge Management Board, Court, DDA, the Ridge Management Board, Court, DDA, DDA, DDA, DDA, DDA, the Ridge Management Board, Court, DDA, DDA, Reliance, Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority, CEC, DDA, DDA, DDA, DDA, the High Court, the High Court, GNCTD, DPCC, DDA, DDA, DDA, GNCTD, the Department of Forests, GNCTD, Developers Ltd., Union of India, MANU/DE/1815/2010, Tamplin Steam Ship Co. Ltd., Anglo-Mexican Petroleum Products Co. Ltd.

DATE: 2010, 30th July, 2010, 1872, 1st August, 1990, 8th January, 2002, 23rd February, 2006, 20th March, 2006, 1981, 90 days, 26th April, 2006, 15th June, 2006, 11th September, 6th November, 2006, 4th December, 2006, September, 2007, February/March 2008, the next several months, 15th July, 2008, 1974, 1981, 15.01.2008, 2006, 2006, 13th 14th March 2008, May 2008, 26th May, 2008, 2006, 1986, 1980, 1972, 1974, 1981, 1986, 1991, 2004, November, 2008, 17th October, 2008, 17th October, 2008, 17th October, 2008, August, 2008, 13th June, 2008, 7777, 2001, 24.05.1994, 08.01.2002, 15th July, 2008, 1st August, 2009, 20th March, 2006, 15th June, 2006, 08.01.2002, 26.02.2006, two months, 23rd June, 2009, 3rd December, 2009, 27.11.2009, 10647/2009, 4677/1985, 4th December, 2009, 2011, 24, August, 2010, 28th October, 2010, 28th October, 2010, 1974, 1981, 1981, 1974, two months, 22.09.10, October, 2015, 3rd December, 2009, October, 2015, 18th November, 2015, 2011, 30th November, 2011, 2011, 30th November, 2011, 30th November, 2011, November, 2012, 2nd November., 2012, 21st October, 2013, 2nd November, 2012, 21st October, 2013, the day, 15th July, 2008, 13th June, 2008, 8th January, 2002, 23rd February, 2006, December, 2009, 1872, a couple of years, 11th September, 2006, 42, 11th September, 2006, June 29, 2016, 2013, 1954, 1916, 1922, 2012

PERSON: Versus Kenneth Builders & Developers Ltd. & Ors, Madan B. Lokur, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Deptts, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, xxx xxx xxx, authorities.8, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Ridge, Plan, Gazette, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Khasra Nos, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, MoEF, Kenneth Builders, MoEF, Ridge, MoEF, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, L.M., L.M., Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Delhi Cantonment, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Gair Mumkin Pahar, Report.10, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, MoEF, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Loreburn, Atkinson, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Raghu Nath, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Kenneth Builders, Ridge, Kenneth Builders, Madan B. Lokur, N.V. Ramana, Kenneth Builders

NORP: J.1, addressee, addressee, MPD2001MPD2021but

ORDINAL: first, 5th, 4th, 6th, 3rd, first, 6th, 6th, 2nd, first, first, second, 3rd, first, second

GPE: Delhi, Delhi, Tehkhand, South Delhi, District Park, Delhi, District Park, Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, India, District Park, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Khasra, WP, Delhi, WP, Delhi, D.O., Delhi Ridge, Delhi Ridge, Delhi, the Central Ridge, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, England, England, Matthey, implementation.38, case.43, New Delhi

CARDINAL: 2009.[1, 6, 14.3, 750, 3500, 26, two, 750, 3500, approximately 4, 450.01, 2006.11, 11.70, approximately 2.60, 3500, 750, 6, 6.1, 6.2, 14, 11.1, 15, 23.04.2008, 23.05.2008, 3, 4, 5, 6, 2006.9, 17, one, one, eight, 30.6.08, two, 18, 19, 26, 27, two, 2, 4, No.3, 444, 445, 20, 105, 14.3, 445, 30.05.08, 27.03.08, 03.06.08, 13.06.08, 13.06.08, 19.02.09, 17.03.09, 16.04.09, 30.07.10, 01.10.10, 25, 26, One, 21.10.2013, two, 27, one, 33, 34, two, one, 6, 11, 24-12-2002, 22-11-2002, 39, 450.01, 1, 2, 8, 2, 5, 2, 6, 8

WORK_OF_ART: Residential, Recreation, No Objection Certificate, Residential, Consent for Establishment, Plan, under Water and Air Acts, the Master Plan, Gai Mumkin Pahar, Consent to Establish, Gair Mumkin Pahar, Residential, Residential

PERCENT: 25%, 75%, 75%, 18%, 6%, 5%, 12%, 6%, 18%, only 6%, 6%

PRODUCT: MoEF, MoEF, MoEF, MoEF, MoEF, Report, Report, Report, Report, Report, MoEF, MoEF, MoEF, AC397

FAC: Tehkhand New Delhi, District Park

LOC: Questionnaire, Tehkhand, Orange Category, South, Environmental Clearance, South, South, South, South, South

EVENT: Additional Solicitor General:“Sub: Opinion of the Ministry of Environment and Forest

QUANTITY: 2.25 acres, 2.25 acre

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //