Arunkumar Champalal (Huf) Vs. Income Tax Officer

Decided On : Jun-18-2002

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

LAW: Section 154, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, the IT Act, Section 88, Section 154, Section 88, Section 154, Section 143(1, the Finance Act, Section 143(1, the IT Act, Section 88, the IT Act, Section 88, the IT Act, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 88, Section 88, Section 154, Section 88, Section 143(1, Section 154, the IT Act, the IT Act, the Finance Act, Section 143(1, the IT Act, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, the IT Act, Section 154, Section 143(1, Section 154, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, Section 143(1, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 154, Section 143, Section 143(1, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 143, the WT Act, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 143(2, Section 143(3, the IT Act, Section 154, Section 154, Section 143(1, Section 154, the IT Act, Section 154, Section 244A, Section 244A, the IT Act

CARDINAL: 1, four, only one, 1,17,470, 35,336, one, 154, 49, 375, 49, 154, 236, 173, 1, 1, 143(1A, 143(1B, 1, 7

DATE: 29th Nov., 2002, 1999-2000, 17th July, 2000, 23rd April, 2001, 1999, 1st June, 1999, 1999, 1st June, 1999, 1st June, 1999, 1st June, 1999, 1994, 1994, 1st June, 1999, 1999, 1999, from 1st day of June, 1999

GPE: CIT(A)-XIV, Mumbai, assessee

ORDINAL: first, first

ORG: AO, AO, AO, PPF, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, PPF, AO, Departmental Representative, PPF, AO, Sections 143(1, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, Tribunal Hyderabad Bench, Anam Machinery Fabricators Ltd., ITO, TTJ, ITD 617, Tribunal, AO, Tribunal Hyderabad, Sections 143(1, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO

PERSON: Bill

MONEY: 20 per cent