Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gopala Pillai Vs. Registrar of Companies
Decided On : Sep-04-1959
Court : Kerala
LAW: Section 282, the Indian Companies Act, Section 141A, the Indian Companies Act, Section 141A, Section 138, Section 141A, the Indian Companies Act, Section 140, Section 141, Section 141A, Section 141A of the Act, Section 220, the Companies Act, Section 141A, the Companies Act, Section 141-A, Section 141-A, the Companies Act, Section 141-A, Section 141, Section 141-A
PERSON: Joseph, Vaikom, Vaikom, Kottayam, Sections 138 to 141A, Ganapat Rai v. Emperor, Registrar, Surendra Nath, Kali Pada, Davis C.J.
ORDINAL: first
DATE: 1956, 1913, the year ending 31st December, 1952, 1913, five years, 1913, 1883, 1910, 1956
ORG: the Bharat Ayurvedic Works Limited, the Government of India, Joint Stock Companies, theAdvocate-General, the Public Prosecutor, the District Magistrate, Joint Stock Companies, the Central Government, Central Government, the Advocate-General, the Public Prosecutor, Expression, Company, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Joint Stock Companies, Government, the Advocate-General Or the Public Prosecutor, the Lahore High Court, AIR, Registrar, Regulation, Registrar, the Calcutta High Court, AIR 1940, the Supreme Court, Gordhandas Bhanji, AIR 1952, SC, the Supreme Court, the Commissioner of Police, the State Government, the Lahore High Court, AIR, the High Court of Calcutta, Registrar, Magistrate
CARDINAL: 2, 141A., 1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3., 4, 30, 5, 5, 196, 198, 9, 620, 25-4-1957, 6., 250, 948, 232
PRODUCT: Inspectors
FAC: Registrar
GPE: Regulation, Emperor, K.S., Bombay