Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gopala Pillai Vs. Registrar of Companies

Decided On : Sep-04-1959

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 282, the Indian Companies Act, Section 141A, the Indian Companies Act, Section 141A, Section 138, Section 141A, the Indian Companies Act, Section 140, Section 141, Section 141A, Section 141A of the Act, Section 220, the Companies Act, Section 141A, the Companies Act, Section 141-A, Section 141-A, the Companies Act, Section 141-A, Section 141, Section 141-A

PERSON: Joseph, Vaikom, Vaikom, Kottayam, Sections 138 to 141A, Ganapat Rai v. Emperor, Registrar, Surendra Nath, Kali Pada, Davis C.J.

ORDINAL: first

DATE: 1956, 1913, the year ending 31st December, 1952, 1913, five years, 1913, 1883, 1910, 1956

ORG: the Bharat Ayurvedic Works Limited, the Government of India, Joint Stock Companies, theAdvocate-General, the Public Prosecutor, the District Magistrate, Joint Stock Companies, the Central Government, Central Government, the Advocate-General, the Public Prosecutor, Expression, Company, Court, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Joint Stock Companies, Government, the Advocate-General Or the Public Prosecutor, the Lahore High Court, AIR, Registrar, Regulation, Registrar, the Calcutta High Court, AIR 1940, the Supreme Court, Gordhandas Bhanji, AIR 1952, SC, the Supreme Court, the Commissioner of Police, the State Government, the Lahore High Court, AIR, the High Court of Calcutta, Registrar, Magistrate

CARDINAL: 2, 141A., 1, 2, 3, 2, 4, 1, 3., 4, 30, 5, 5, 196, 198, 9, 620, 25-4-1957, 6., 250, 948, 232

PRODUCT: Inspectors

FAC: Registrar

GPE: Regulation, Emperor, K.S., Bombay

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //