Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

CochIn Company Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Decided On : Apr-11-1975

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 256(1, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 33(1A)(a, Section 33(1A)(a, Circular, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, Section 2(7, the Explanation to Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 33 of the Act, Section 33, Section 33, Circular, Circular, Section 10(2)(vib, Section 33(1A, Section 33(1A)of the Act, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, Section 2(5)(a)(i, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, the Explanation to Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, Section 2(7)(d, Section 2(7, Section 2, Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, Section 2(7)(d, the Finance Act, Section 260

PERSON: Balakrishna Eradi, Cochin Bench, Ernakulam, Paragraph F of Schedule, Tribunalproceeded, Item, Raja Bahadur, Bacha F. Guzdar, I. T. R. No

NORP: J.1, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, non-Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Item

CARDINAL: two, three, two, one, 27, 10/49-65, 2, 48,692, 15,387, 33,305, 3., 5,79,382, 1,35,190, 4, 5, 33,305, two, 6, two, three, 27, 15,387, 48,692, 7., 8., 9, two, 10, 1, 1968]67ITR199(SC, 1A, 1, 1A, 1A, 11, 27, 27, two, 12, 27, 62, 27, 15, 5, one-tenth, 16, 1945, 16, 325, 17, less than fifty-one, 18, 10,00,000, 19, more than one, 20, more than one, less than fifty-one, 21, fifty-five, 22, two, 23, 1

DATE: 1961, the year 1966-67, 1955, 6th July, 1955, October 14, 1965, 1966, 1966, December, 1963, the assessment year 1966-67, the previous year, the previous year, the assessment year 1966-67, that year, the assessment year 1966-67, 1,35,190, 1966, 1966, 1966, 1966, 1966, 1966, 1966, November 30, 1972, the years 1965-66, 1969-70, July 6, 1956, October 14, 1965, 6th July, 1955, 14th October, 1965, December, 1963, 1966, 196,6, the assessment year 1966-67, 1966, 1966, April 30, 1973, December, 1963, Section 33(1)(a, the 31st day of March, 1964, December, 1963, 6th July, 1955, October 14, 1965, July 6, 1955, March 31, 1964, 6th July, 1955, October 14, 1965, 6th July, 1955, 31st March, 1954, 1951, the 23rd October, 1951, 31st March, 1954, '13, 1955, July 6, 1955, an assessee after, March 31, 1954, XLVII-16)of 1962, December 3, 1962, March 31, 1964, March 31, 1964, 1961, 6th July, 1955, March 31, 1954, July 6, 1955, an assessee before March 31, 1964, March 31, 1964, July 6, 1955, 1966, the 1st day of April, 1966, 1971, 29th May, 1973, 1966, 1966, 1966, the previous year, 1966, 1966, previous year, 1966, 1966, previous year, the previous year, 1966, 1966, the assessment year, 1966, the assessment year 1966-67

ORG: Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Board of Revenue, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Tribunal, Tribunal, Officeron, Paragraph F of Schedule, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Paragraph F of Schedule, Appellate, Appellate, Appellate, Paragraph F of Schedule, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal on behalf, the Central Board of Revenue, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Paragraph F of Schedule, Tribunal, the Tribunal under Section 256(1, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Cochin Co., Parliament, Tribunal, the Central Board of Revenue, Reliance, the Central Board of Direct Taxes, Board's Circular No, the Central Board of Revenue/Central Board of Direct Taxes, Tribunal, Board's Circular No, XIX-2, The Board, Board's Circular No, Board's Circular No., CBDT, CBDT, CBDT, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITR, Tribunal, Tribunal, Paragraph F of Schedule, Paragraph F of Schedule, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Explanation, Tribunal, Paragraph F of Schedule 1, Tribunal, Explanation, Explanation, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Parliament, Tribunal, Tribunal, Explanation, Explanation, Explanation, the First Schedule of the Finance Act, Tribunal, the High Court, Registrar, the Appellate Tribunal

GPE: India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, Clause, Clause, Clause, Clause

MONEY: 55 per cent, 65 per cent, 55 per cent, 55 per cent, 55 per cent

ORDINAL: second, second, first, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, first, second, First

PERCENT: 60%

WORK_OF_ART: English Dictionary

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //