Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Harbanslal Aurora Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Decided On : Jan-31-2002
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
LAW: Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 48, the IT Act, Section 48, Section 143(1)(a, the Company Law, Section 139(9, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143{l)(a, Section 48, Section 143(3, Section 143(2, Section 143(1)(a).12, Section 32A(4, Section 48, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 48, the IT Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 80L, Section 143(1)(a, Section .143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a).20, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act, Section 255(4, the IT Act, Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act, Section 143(1, Section 48 of the Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1, Section 143(2, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143.4, Section 154, Section 143(1)(a, Constitution, Section 143(1)(a, Section 54F, Section 54F(4, Section 48.Originally, Section 48(ii, Section 48(i, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1).9, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act
CARDINAL: 1, 1,12,56,915, 3,069, 22,98,334, 2.41, 2.41, 2.41, 2, 2, 2.41, 2.41, 3, 12,000, 2.41, 2.41, 1, 2.41, 196, 200, 193, 212, 196, 3,069, 12,000, 3, 2.41, 1., three, 2.41, seven, two, two, 1,12,56,915, 3,069, 2,41,00,000, 2,41,00,000, 1, 2, 3, 10., 12,000, 12,000, 15,56,07,200, 53, 11, 2, 2.41, 143(3, 3, 75, facts.13, 2.41, 3,069, two, two, 2.41, 2.41, 3,069, 14,981, 7, 2.41, 2.41, 2.41, 9, 9, 2.41, 2.41, 18, 31 to 38, 2.41., 2.41, 2.41, 19, 196, 71, 2.41, 52, 311, 50, 2.41, 2.41, 58, 53, 196, 36, 3,069, 12,000, 2,41, 2.41, 2.41, 2, 2.41, 196, 59, 2, 14, 689, 209, 2.41, 7.8, 200, 218, 298, 308, 10, two, 2.41, 2.41, 2
ORG: AO, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, AO, the Tribunal 4, the Company Law Board, the Bombay High Court, Khatau Junkar Ltd., CIT, ITR, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Bank of America N.T. &, SA, ITR 739, Delhi High Court, S.R.F. Charitable Trust v. Union of India, Calcutta High Court, Modern Fibotex India Ltd., CIT, CIT, V. Ramaswamy Mudaliar, ITR, Departmental Representative, the Bombay High Court, Khatau Junkar Ltd., AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, the Bombay High Court, Khatau Junkar Ltd., TDS, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, P) Ltd., AO, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, SC, AO, AO, V. Ramaswamy Mudaliar, the WT Rules, Departmental Representative, the Bombay High Court, Khatau Junkat Ltd., the Bombay High Court, AO, the Bombay High Court, AO, Tribunal, M/s Hotel Amir, M/s Hotel Amir, M/s Hotel Amir, M/s Hotel Amir, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, P) Ltd.'s, AO, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Company Petition, M/s Amir Hotels, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, The Company Law Board, the Company Law Board, AO, AO, Kale and Ors, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, Khatau Junkar Ltd., CIT, ITR, Khatau Junkar Ltd., AO, AO, Department, AO, Singarani Collieries Co. Ltd v. Dy, CIT, TTJ, the Hon'ble Tribunal, the Bombay High Court, Khatau Junkar Ltd., Asstt, JTD 314 (Bom, AO, AO, the Delhi Tribunal, Asst, CIT, ITD 131, the Pune Tribunal, Bajaj Auto Finance, CIT, CIT, ITR, Tribunal, AO, AO, AO, JM, Tribunal, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, AO, AO, Khatau Junkar Ltd., CIT, ITR, ITO, the Hon'ble High Court, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, Khatau Junkar Ltd, CBDT, the Raja J. Ghelliah, Tax Reforms Committee, Bank of America N.T. &, S.A. v, CIT, ITR 739, Hon'ble High Court, AO, CBDT, AO, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, Registry, Bench, JM, M/s Bhojwani Hotels, AO, JM
DATE: 1997-98, 1st April, 1981, May, 1996, 1st April, 1981, 48, 1992, 55, 73, 1993, 1992, 1995, 1992, 31st March, 1999, 31st March, 1999, the year, May, 1996, May, 1996, 17th April, 1981, 1964, 6th May, 1996, the year, 1st April, 1981, The year, 1st April, 1981, 6th May, 1996, May, 1996, May, 1996, 26th May, 1996 i.e., 10th June, 1996, 1992, 55, 31st March, 1999, 1995, 1994, 54, 1996, 1995, 1992, 21, 1961, 1961, 1992, 55, Aug., 1994, 1994, 75, 1993, 1996, 1961, Dec., 2001
FAC: Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Koregaon Park, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir, Hotel Amir
PERSON: Bhojwani, Hotel Amir, Amir Hotels, Amir Hotels, Sunil Pathak, Pathak, AOs, K.S. Pathania, v. Dy, CTT, Amir Hotels, Hotel Amir, Amir Hotels, Amir Hotels, Amir Hotels, Kanpur Coal Syndicate, Amir Hotels, Amir Hotels, Rule, Amir Hotel, Hotel Amir, Pathak, K.S. Pathania, Pushpa B. Sheth v., Ltd- v. Dy, Ramaswamy Mudaliai, Shri Pathak, Pathak, Pathak, K.S. Pathania, Art, Pathak, Ex Abundanti Cautela, Granites, Kar, M.K. Chaturvedi
ORDINAL: 26th, 6th, Firstly, third, first, 26th, 6th, 6th, first, second, 6th, Third, 24th, first, Third, Third, 7th
PRODUCT: 939, 939
GPE: assessee, Clause, assessee, Ramchandra
NORP: r.
MONEY: eight per cent
EVENT: the Bombay Bench '
TIME: 53 and