Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mery Metilda and anr. Vs. Kunjiran Kunju Kathija Ummal and ors.

Decided On : May-29-1968

Court : Kerala

LAW: Section 31, the Nayar Act

PERSON: P.T. Raman Nayar, Peter, Kochana, Mohammed, Peter, O. S. No, Mohammed, Kochana, Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed, Peter, Peter, Peter, Peter, Mohammed, Mohammed, Peter, Mohammed, Peter, Mohammed, Mohammed, Kochana, Mohammed, Mohammed, Ihave, Peter, Kamakshi Amma v., Gangadharan Pillai, Peter, Kochana, Nayar, Mohammed, Mohammed, Kochana, Mohd, Sulaiman, Mohd, Ismail, Mohammed, Peter, Mohammed, Mohammed

NORP: J.1, P-1, Muslim, Muslim

DATE: the year 1110 M. E., 1934-35 A. D., two years later, 1122, 1-4-1949, 1954, July 1956, 4, 1953, 1953, 1954

CARDINAL: one, two, 11, One, 13-3-1946, 4-3-1947, 681, two, 11, 3, two, 2, 23-6-1951, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 22-6-1951, 23-6-1951, 7/72, one, 13, 12, one, three, two, 3, 3and 4, 3

GPE: Kochana, Kochana, Kochana, Kochana, Kochana

ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd, first, first, first

MONEY: four cents

ORG: Ext, Peter's Court, Ext, Court, the Lower Appellate Court, Court, The Lower Appellate Court, Court, Ext, Court, Trav-Co, Court, Trav-Co, AIR 1966, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, and4

EVENT: SC 792

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //