Semantic Analysis by spaCy
income Tax Officer Vs. Devi Dayal Rice Mills
Decided On : Nov-12-2001
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
LAW: Section 69, the IT Act, Section 69
CARDINAL: 1, 1, 4,97,250, 2., 3, 4., 2, 50,000, 50,000, 4, 4,97,250, 4,00,000, 7,00,000, 50,000, 33, 401, 4,459, only 2,569, 3,78,270, 3,78,270, 34,070, 26.000, one, 66, 199, 50,000
DATE: Dec., 1993, the year, 30th Oct., 1989, 31st Dec. 1989, 28th Feb., 1990, the year, the year 1989-90, 50,000.7, 1989, 12th April, 1977, 1st March, 1977, March, 1998, 2000
GPE: assessee, assessee, Kanjibhai
ORG: Department, the Department of the same, Department, AO, AO, AO, AO, Department, C/C, G.P., Department, AO, AO, TTJ, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, CIT, Prem Singh &, Co., Tribunal, Laxmi Commercial Bank, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, CIT v. Vighyan Chemicals Industries, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Regional Food Controller, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Regional Food Controller, CIT, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, the Tribunal Ahmedabad 'C' Bench, AO, TTJ, ITO, AO, Department
ORDINAL: first, third, 26th
PERSON: Rose Carpet v. ITO, Metal Works, Gopal Rice, N. Swamy, Jagdip Kanjibhai
NORP: Hon'ble, Rose Carpets