Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income Tax Officer Vs. Devi Dayal Rice Mills

Decided On : Nov-12-2001

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

LAW: Section 69, the IT Act, Section 69

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 4,97,250, 2., 3, 4., 2, 50,000, 50,000, 4, 4,97,250, 4,00,000, 7,00,000, 50,000, 33, 401, 4,459, only 2,569, 3,78,270, 3,78,270, 34,070, 26.000, one, 66, 199, 50,000

DATE: Dec., 1993, the year, 30th Oct., 1989, 31st Dec. 1989, 28th Feb., 1990, the year, the year 1989-90, 50,000.7, 1989, 12th April, 1977, 1st March, 1977, March, 1998, 2000

GPE: assessee, assessee, Kanjibhai

ORG: Department, the Department of the same, Department, AO, AO, AO, AO, Department, C/C, G.P., Department, AO, AO, TTJ, Departmental Representative, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, CIT, Prem Singh &amp, Co., Tribunal, Laxmi Commercial Bank, ITO, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, CIT v. Vighyan Chemicals Industries, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT, the Regional Food Controller, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Regional Food Controller, CIT, ITO, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, ITO, the Tribunal Ahmedabad 'C' Bench, AO, TTJ, ITO, AO, Department

ORDINAL: first, third, 26th

PERSON: Rose Carpet v. ITO, Metal Works, Gopal Rice, N. Swamy, Jagdip Kanjibhai

NORP: Hon'ble, Rose Carpets

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //