Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Om Sindhoori Capital Investment Vs. Joint Cit

Decided On : Sep-27-2001

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai

LAW: the Income Tax Act, Explanation 3, Explanation 3

ORG: Chennai, Jonas Woodhead &amp, Sons (India) Ltd., JWSIL, JWSIL, The Income Tax Rules, AO, JWSIL, the Commissioner (Appeals, Tribunal, JWSIL, JWSIL, the Indian Income Tax Act, the Explanation 4A

DATE: 25-11-1999, 1961, the next day, 1962, the year 1976, 1995, 1976, 1995, 1999, the assessment year 1996-97, the year ended 31-3-1996, 1976, 1976, 4, 1922, 11 of 1922

CARDINAL: only one, 10-8-1995, 1.05, 30, 24, 21, 1.36, 1.05, 30, 30, 30, 78, 10-8-1995, 24, 15, 31, 67, 83.The, 31, 2, 30, 1.05, 4A

MONEY: hundred per cent, hundred per cent, hundred per cent

PERSON: Vijayaraghavan, Venkatesa Gopinath, P.S.Subramanian, Venkatesa Gopinath, Explanation 4A

GPE: Civil

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, first, first, second, first, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, second, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //