Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Padmanabhan Mathevan Vs. Ramaswami Pillai Mathevan Pillai

Decided On : Mar-04-1958

Court : Kerala

LAW: Article 182, Article 182, Article 182, the Limitation Act, Article 182(2, the Limitation Act, Section 41, Section 48, the Indian Civil Procedure Code, Section 15, Registration Act II, Article 166 of the Travancore Limitation Act, Article 182, Indian Limitation Act, Section 41, S. 15 ofRegulation II, Article 183 or, The Limitation Act, Indian Act, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Registration Act, Section 6, the General Clauses Act, Section 6, the Central Act III, Indian Registration Act, Article 182, the Indian Limitation Act, the Indian Registration Act, Article 182, Section 6

PERSON: Varadaraja Iyengar, Govindarajachari, Gentle C. J. agreed, Krishna Kammathy v., Indira Sohanlal v. Custodian

NORP: J.1

ORDINAL: 5th, 5th, first, 5th, first, second, second, first, first, first, second, second

CARDINAL: 3, 4, 22-6-1953, 5, 2, one, two, 1908.Threeyears, two, 602, 186

DATE: 18-10-1123, more than three years, 1948, four years, the 12 years', 12 years, more than three years, six years, 1087, six years, three years, 1087, six years, six years, 1951, 1897, 1951, six years, 1955

GPE: Lekshiminarasimham, Suryanarana, Delhi, -Joseph, Jesayya

ORG: Clause, Kanmammal v. Balakrishna Tharvady, AIR 1935 Mad, Trav-Co 184, Civil Court, Civil Court, State, Section 6.'If, State, State, Proviso, concerned--, SC, Bench, AIR 1955 SC

PRODUCT: Articles

EVENT: Proviso of Section 6

WORK_OF_ART: Travancore Law

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //