Standing Conference of Public Enterprises Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Decided On : Nov-10-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 239 of the Constitution of India, Section 10, the Societies' Act, Article 12 of the Constitution, the CLRA Act, the I.D. Act, Section 2(s, the ID Act, the Amending Act 36 of 1956, the Amending Act 46 of 1982, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, Section 2(s, the Industrial Disputes Act, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25(F, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25(F, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 25F, Section 25(F

ORG: Shiv Narayan Dhingra, Industrial Tribunal I, the Public Enterprises Services Association, CBI, Government of NCT, the Industrial Tribunal, Tribunal, Claimant, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Government, the Union Territory, the Central Government, Tribunal, Delhi Government, Tribunal, State, State, Central Government, the Delhi Government, Tribunal, the Delhi Government, Court, Delhi Government, Labour Advisory Board, The Labour Advisory Board, the Ministry of Labour, Government of India, Contract Labour(Regulations & Abolition, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Delhi Government, the Central Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Central Government, Tribunal, In Steel Authority of India Ltd and Ors, National Waterfront Workers' Union, the Supreme Court, Central Government, Central Government, State, the Central Government, the Central Government, a Central Government Company, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, the Central Government, Statute, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Advisory Board of Delhi Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, the Central Government, the Delhi Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, LIC, Supreme Court, Management of M/s. May, Western India Match Co. Ltd., Court, Tribunal, Scheme, Corporation, Tribunal, RCC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Conditions, Tribunal, RCC, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 20.1.2004, 2, one, 39, one, 1,518/-, 3, No.2, 4., No.2, one, 11.2.2000, 2001)IILLJ1087SC, 8, No.2, one, No.2, 2004)IIILLJ740SC, 1961)IILLJ94SC, 1963)IILLJ459SC, 29.8.1956, 28.5.1996, 9, 10, 1, 2[for, 11, only one, 13

PERCENT: 50%, 100%

DATE: 30th September, 2001, from 1.10.2001 till July, 2002, 16th July, 1985, three months, 3.7.1987, one month, 15 days, 1988, October, 2000, October, 2000, one month's, 15 days', many years, 2486 of 1997, 16/7/1987, an apprentice.(Para 23, 1600/-, less than one year, one month's, fifteen days', six months, one month's, one month, 15 days', years, one month, one month, one month, one month's, July, 2002, 1988, July, 2002, several months

GPE: Laxmi Nagar, SCOPE, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, India, Delhi, India

PERSON: Shri Raghubir Singh, Bhagwan Singh, Foreman, Mukesh K. Tripathi v. Sr, Baker, Sandoz, Foreman, meson, Supervisor

PRODUCT: No.1, Appellant

NORP: Statute

FAC: H.R. Adyanthaya v.

WORK_OF_ART: The Constitution Bench

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second

LOC: the Appellant herein

EVENT: I.D. Act