Shiv Nandan Kaushik Vs. Dy. Cit

Decided On : Apr-30-2001

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

LAW: the Income Tax Act, section 271D, section 271D, section 143(3, section 271D, section 271D, section 271D, section 271D, section 271D, section 271D, Chapter XX, the Income Tax Act, section 271D, section 271D., section 271D.

CARDINAL: 23, 1., 6, 1961.2, one, 17, 1, 6-12-1999, 30-12-1999, 27, 76,328, 1, 269SS, 2, 8,000, 2,08,000, 1,04,000, 31-3-1998, 1, 1, 1,04,000, 23,558, 1,04,000, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 20 to 26, 2, 83, 29, 20,000, 20,000, 16-12-1997, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 271D., 2, 269SS, 269, 185, 595, 16, 78, 16

ORG: Commissioner (Appeals, Bathinda, CADC, Departmental Representative, Golden Forests, the Punjab National Bank, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Punjab National Bank, Manimajra, the Commissioner (Appeals, Honble Supreme Court, Hindustan Steel Ltd., State of, SC, Tribunal, KVSS, the Commissioner (Appeals, Departmental Representative, GFIL.The, CIT, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Appeals, ITO, AP, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Reliance, Honble Apex Court, Hindustan Steel Ltd., State of, Tribunal, SMC, Asstt, CIT, Jag Vijay Auto Finance, P) Ltd., DTC, Jp-Trib, ITD 378, Jp-Trib, Tribunal, Tribunal, ITO, Canal Lining Material Co., ITA Nos, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, KVSS

DATE: the assessment year 1995-96, 18 days, 28-12-1999, 18 days, the assessment year 1995-96, 10370, 20-7-1994, 10370, 1972, the assessment year 1995-96, 10370, 269SS, 1990, 26, 2000, 2001, 1551, 1552, year 1990-91).Having

PERSON: Bhatinda, Bhatinda, Ambala Range, Ambala, Bhatinda, Shri Pardeep Kaushik, Shri Pardeep Kaushik, Shri Pardeep Kaushik, Pinjore, Shri Pardeep Kaushik, Pinjore, Calcutta Bench, B.G. Panda, Shri Pardeep Kaushik, Law Enterprises, Deepak Muchala, Jaipur Bench, Calcutta Bench, B.J. Panda, Chandigarh Bench

GPE: Orissa, Tribunal

QUANTITY: 30-9-1998

TIME: 30-9-1998

PRODUCT: 269SS, 269SS, 539

FAC: Mohan Karkare v. Dy