Nandu and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Decided On : Apr-27-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6, Section 9 and 10 of the Act, Section 4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 17(4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 17, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6 declaration, Section 4, Section 6, Section 17, Section 4, Section 17(4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 17(4, Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 17(4, Section 5(A, Section 17(1, Section 17(4, Section 17(1, Section 17(4, Section 5(A, Section 5(A, Section 5A of the Act, Order 1 Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 4, Section 6, Section 5A, Section 4, Section 17(4, Section 5-A of the Act, Section 4(1, Section 5-A, Section 17, Section 17(1-A, Section 5-A, Section 5-A, Section 6, Section 4(1, Section 5-A, Section 17, Section 17(4, Section 5-A, Section 5-A, section 5-A, section 17(4, section 4, Section 17(4, Section 17(4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 17(4, Section 17(4, Section 5A of the Act, Section 5A, Section 6, Section 6, Section 5A, Section 17(4, Section 6 of the Act, Section 5A, Section 6(1, Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6 of the Act, Section 6, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 6(1, Section 17(4, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 6(1, Section 6, Section 5A, Section 17(4, Section 6 of the Act, Section 5A, Section 6(1, Section 4, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 6(1, Section 17(4, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 6(1, Section 6, Section 4, Section 6, Section 4, Section 5A

PERSON: Swatanter Kumar, Bindapur, Khasra Nos, Bindapur, Bindapur, Bindapur, Papankala, Khasra Nos, Kabza Karvayee, Khasra Nos, AIR1993SC2517, WP(C, Shri Mohta, Bench, Shri Mohta, Jan Kalyan Samiti, G.B. Pattanaik, Shri Mohta, Jai Narain v. Union, Kuldip Singh, S. Sagir Ahmad, Kuldip Singh, Shri Mohta, Hans, Kishan Lal, Padmasundara Rao, Sundara Rao, Padmasundara Rao, Explanationn, Padmasundara Rao, Padmasundara Rao, Explanationn, Padmasundara Rao

CARDINAL: two, 17, 2891, 8, 733, 14, 17, 2, 3., 4., 88, 5., about 9 bighas 12, 383, 389, about 4.16, 4, 16, 84, one, about 2891, 8, 389, 2, 8, 24/1989-90, 38, 3, 383, 389, about 9 bigha 12, 389, 2.8, 24/1989-90, 383, 389, about 9 bigha 12, 8., 383, 389, about 2, 8, 4.16, 122(2005)DLT353, 9, 3.2.2005, 10, 11, 17(4, 12, 5769/92, 2.8, 389, 4.16, one, 38, 3, 17.5.88, 25, 4, 23, 24, 1997]1SCR210, two, 1996]1SCR307, two, 4, two, 3, 24-3-1995, 33, 18, 19, 20, 21, 2002]255ITR147(SC, 5 to 10, 123(2005)DLT206, 22, One, 20, 22, One, 7, 421, 6, one, 13

DATE: 6, 18th December, 87, 14th January, 88, 18th September, 84, 163/86-87, 6, all these years, 17th May, 16th August, 88, 16th April, 7th March, 2006, 6th March, 2006, 7th March, 2006, 31st March, 2006, 21st April, 2006, 18th July, 87, 14th January, 1988, 27th January, 18th December, 1987, 14th January, 1988, 18th March, 1988, 10th January, 1990, 18th March, 1988, 18th March, 1988, the same day, 7446/1999, 6, 1894, 7446/1999, 18th March, 88, January, 1988, 17th May, 88, 1988, January 1988, 21-4-1995, 32, ten years, a period of, two years, 18th July, 1988, 17th August, 1988, one year, one year, 18th July, 1988, 21st July, 1988, 24th September, 1988, September, 1988, September, 1988, the period of one year, 21st July, 1988, September, 1988, one year, 30th June, 1988, 8th July, 2002, 14 years, 8 days later, the period between 12th August, 1988, 30th August, 2001, 11 months, 20 days, a period of, one year, 1963, one year, years, 17th August, 1988, one year, one year, 18th July, 1988, 21st July, 1988, 24th September, 1988, September, 1988, September, 1988, the period of one year, 21st July, 1988, September, 1988, 1963, one year, years, 25th April, 1988, 1986, 18th July, 1988, 17th August, 1988, 16th October, 1985, 18th July, 1988, 30 days, six months

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Award, Para 23, Para 24, Bench

ORG: Planned Development of Delhi', Court, DDA, Government, Court, Court, DDA, Court, Ashish Paul v. Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, Satendra Prasad Jain and Ors, State of U.P and Ors, Court, the Supreme Court, DDA, PDD-Implementation of Papankala Scheme, Court, 3.2.05, W.P., DDA, DDA, DDA, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Siva Apparels, Union of India, Court, State, Court, U.P., Court, Ramaswamy, J. And G.T. Nanavati, the U.P. Legislature, Ghaziabad Development Authority, K. Ramaswamy, Bench, STP, Court, STP, Court, MCD, NDMC, River Yamuna, Court, STP, Court, Court, State, Court, State, the supreme Court, Court, Mukesh Hans v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, the Land Acquisition Authority, under:-A, State, the State Administration, Lordships, Court, the Division Bench, Court, Shanti India Private Limited, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Ors, T.N., Court, the State Government, Court, the State Government, the Supreme Court, Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Suleman v. Union of India, Supreme Court, Court, Explanationn 1 to Section 6(1, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Division Benches, Court, the Division Bench, Court, Shanti India Private Limited, the State Government, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Division Benches, Court, Court, the Division Bench, Court, the Government under Section 4 of the Act, Court, Court

ORDINAL: Secondly, first, first, first, first, first, 9th, 9th, 9th, 9th

PERCENT: 80%, 80%, 80%, 80%

GPE: Delhi, Village Bindapur, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Okhla, Delhi, Delhi, Explanationn, Explanationn, Padma

WORK_OF_ART: The Award No

LOC: Khasras, Yamuna

FAC: Shanti India, Shanti India, Khasra No

NORP: A.P. Sareen