Semantic Analysis by spaCy
income Tax Officer Vs. Fashionways
Decided On : Feb-08-2001
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
LAW: the IT Act, Section 131(3, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c
CARDINAL: 1, 1, 43,489, 2, 3., 3, 52,290, 1,42,378, 43,489, 3, two, 42,090, 1,42,378, 90,288, two, 90,299, 43,489, 4, 15,91,960, 52,290, 1,42,378, 5, 129, 6, 175, 1999.8, 6, 6, 175
ORDINAL: 13th, 10th, second, first, 27th, first
DATE: May, 1994, 1990-91, 1961, 1961, 3rd Sept., 1990, 25th Feb., 1991, 26th Feb., 1991, 5th April, 1989, 1990, 3rd Sept., 1990, 9th Jan., 1991, 11 months, 23,35,742, 1990, 2nd Dec., 1993, 1980, 27th Oct., Oct., 1999
ORG: AO, AO, Sections, AO, AO, AO, Department, Department, AO, AO, Department, M/s Abrol Industries, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, Sons, Explanation, Department, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, Department, Department, AO, ITO, Abrol Industries, Department, Tribunal, ITO, Abrol Industries, AO, Tribunal, ITA No, ITO, Abrol Industries Jammu
PERSON: Qummar-Ud-Din &, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar Bench, Jammu, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar Bench
GPE: Jammu, yr.1990