Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

income Tax Officer Vs. Fashionways

Decided On : Feb-08-2001

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar

LAW: the IT Act, Section 131(3, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c, the IT Act, Section 271(1)(c, Section 271(1)(c

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 43,489, 2, 3., 3, 52,290, 1,42,378, 43,489, 3, two, 42,090, 1,42,378, 90,288, two, 90,299, 43,489, 4, 15,91,960, 52,290, 1,42,378, 5, 129, 6, 175, 1999.8, 6, 6, 175

ORDINAL: 13th, 10th, second, first, 27th, first

DATE: May, 1994, 1990-91, 1961, 1961, 3rd Sept., 1990, 25th Feb., 1991, 26th Feb., 1991, 5th April, 1989, 1990, 3rd Sept., 1990, 9th Jan., 1991, 11 months, 23,35,742, 1990, 2nd Dec., 1993, 1980, 27th Oct., Oct., 1999

ORG: AO, AO, Sections, AO, AO, AO, Department, Department, AO, AO, Department, M/s Abrol Industries, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court, Sons, Explanation, Department, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative, Department, Department, AO, ITO, Abrol Industries, Department, Tribunal, ITO, Abrol Industries, AO, Tribunal, ITA No, ITO, Abrol Industries Jammu

PERSON: Qummar-Ud-Din &, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar Bench, Jammu, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar Bench

GPE: Jammu, yr.1990

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //