Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Paul Manufacturing Co. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.
Decided On : Jan-31-2006
Court : Delhi
LAW: Article 226, the Trade Marks Act, Section 109, Section 3, Section 57(2, Article 226 of the Constitution
PERSON: Vikramajit Sen, Order, Pratibha M. Singh, Sudhir Chandra, Sudhir Chandra
NORP: J.1
CARDINAL: 227, 20.10.2005, 20.1.2006, 30.1.2006, 4, two
GPE: India, Mumbai
ORG: the Registration Certificate of the Trade Mark Registration No, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, IPAB, Coram, Joint, Government of India, Court, the Appellate Board, Technical, the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry,, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, the Rectification Application, IPAB, Government, Appeal/Rectification Application, the Trade Marks Act, Respondents, the Writ Petition, IPAB, Respondents, Reliance, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Whirlpool Corporation, Registrar of Trade Marks, Registrar, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, Registrar, Tribunal, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, the Trade Marks Act, Respondents, an Appeal/Rectification Application, the Coram of the IPAB, Court, Court, Rectification Application, IPAB
DATE: 1280913, 1999, one month, 1999
ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly
FAC: Registrar
WORK_OF_ART: a Writ Petition