Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Paul Manufacturing Co. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.

Decided On : Jan-31-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 226, the Trade Marks Act, Section 109, Section 3, Section 57(2, Article 226 of the Constitution

PERSON: Vikramajit Sen, Order, Pratibha M. Singh, Sudhir Chandra, Sudhir Chandra

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 227, 20.10.2005, 20.1.2006, 30.1.2006, 4, two

GPE: India, Mumbai

ORG: the Registration Certificate of the Trade Mark Registration No, the Registrar of Trade Marks, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, IPAB, Coram, Joint, Government of India, Court, the Appellate Board, Technical, the Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry,, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion, the Rectification Application, IPAB, Government, Appeal/Rectification Application, the Trade Marks Act, Respondents, the Writ Petition, IPAB, Respondents, Reliance, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Whirlpool Corporation, Registrar of Trade Marks, Registrar, Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, Tribunal, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, Registrar, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, Registrar, Tribunal, Registrar, the High Court, Registrar, the Trade Marks Act, Respondents, an Appeal/Rectification Application, the Coram of the IPAB, Court, Court, Rectification Application, IPAB

DATE: 1280913, 1999, one month, 1999

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly

FAC: Registrar

WORK_OF_ART: a Writ Petition

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //