National Projects Constructions Corporaton Limited Vs. Bundela Bandhu Constructions Company

Decided On : Apr-18-2007

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 34 of the 1996 Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Arbitration Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 17, Section 30, Section 35, Section 30, Section 32, Section 30, Article 158 of the Limitation Act, Section 30, Section 30 of the Act, Section 30, Section 30, Section 17, Section 30, Article 158 of the Limitation Act, Article 158, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 31, Section 31, Section 32 of the Act, Section 33(1, Section 33(4, Section 34(3, Section 34(3, Section 31, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34 of the Act, Section 34(1, Section 43, the Limitation Act, Section 34, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 14(2, Arbitration Act, Section 32(5, Section 14(2, Article 119 of the Limitation Act, Section 32(5, the Companies Act

PERSON: Vikramajit Sen, Award, Award, Award, Affidavit, Award, Award, Award, DDA, Madan Lal v. Sunder Lal, suo motu, Hiralal Motichand, Isharsingh Kripalsingh, suo motu, Hastimal, suo motu, suo motu, suo motu, AIR1956Cal321, Santosh Kumar, Award, Award, Scale 574, Tecco Trichy, Award, Santosh Kumar, JT, Haryana, Chandra Mani, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Explanationn, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award, Surendra Kumar, Counsel, S.S. Juneja, R.P. Arora v. Union, Award, Award, Alpha Woven Labels, Award, Award, Award, Award, Order XXIX, Award, Award, Award, Award, Orders XXXIX Rule 2, Award, Impugned Order

NORP: J.1

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Respondent, appellant.5, Single, Single Judge, Govt, Govt, Govt, Single, Single Judge

CARDINAL: 9.12.2004, 12, 15.1.2005.2, 20.1.1997, 23.3.2004, 4/2004, 12, 3, 86(2000)DLT748, 1967]3SCR147, two, two, five, 3:2, 5, 10, 19, 5, 3, 1, 6, 2004)1SCC540, 369, 4/2004, 14.3.2002, 113, 61(1996)DLT42, 82(1999)DLT686 one, one, 84(2000)DLT54, 3(2

DATE: 1996, seven years, 1996, some days, months, 1940, the period of, 30 days, 1940, 30 days, more than 30 days, 30 days, more than 30 days, more than 30 days, 30 days, that date, 2001, 3 months, 30 days, 34 days, 24 days, 2006, 1963, 30 days, 1963, 120 days, 109 days, three months, another thirty days, thirty days, three months, thirty days, the expiry of three months, 1940, almost seven years, 20.1.1997, seven long years, 2004, 120 days, 3 months plus, thirty days, Section 31(5, 1940, a period of, 30 days, today, thirty days, the expiry of three months, 30 days, 20.1.1997, 8040/1004

WORK_OF_ART: A and C Act', Hastimal Dalichand v., The Sole Arbitrator, Leave to Defend'

ORG: Court, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, Union of India v. Popular Construction Co., the Bank Guarantees, the Respondent/Judgment Debtor, the Execution Proceedings, the Respondent/Claimant, the Registry of this Court, Court, Court, Parliament, Courts, Court, Popular Construction, Parliament, Arbitration Act, Court, Civil Courts, Courts, Court, Award, Enkay Construction Co., Court, High Courts, Reliance, Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Court, Saha, Co., Court, Court, Court, Court, Saha and Co.'s, Saha and Co.'s, Court, Saha and Co.'s, Reliance, Union of India, Tecco Trichy Engineers and Contractors, Popular Construction, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the Union of India, the Union of India, the Union of India, Chennai, the Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Lordships, the Popular Construction, Tecco Trichy, Learned Counsel, the Apex Court, Goa v. Western Builders, Counsel for the Respondent., Lordships, National Aluminum Co. Ltd., Pressteel, Lordships, Court, Court, Court, Court, Lordships, Tecco Trichy, State, State, Lordships, LPA, the High Court, Court, Award, Appeals, Court, Learned Counsel, Indian Rayon Corporation Ltd., Raunaq and Company Pvt, Court, Appellant, Arbitrator, Execution Proceedings, Court, Execution Proceedings, Phonographic Performance Ltd., Department of Trade and Industry, EWHC 1795(Ch, Execution Proceedings, Holder, EA 39/2004, the Arbitral Tribunal, Registry, Arbitrator, Learned Counsel, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Union of India, Arbitration Act, Court, Notice, Ministry of Urban Development, C.P.W.D., Ministry of Urban Development, the Executive Engineer, the Union of India, Union of India, Ministry of Urban Development, Arbitration, Ministry of Urban Development, Registrar, Ministry of Urban Development, Court, Court, the Executive Engineer, the Government of India, Ministry of Urban Development, Court, the Executive Engineer, Construction Division-II, CPWD, Suit, Court, State, a Civil Court, CPC, Court, Claimant, the Arbitral Proceedings, the Registered Office of the Appellant, CPC, KLG System Ltd., Fujitsu ICIM Ltd., Court, the Process Server, the 'Leave to Defend', Pleasant Securities and Finance Ltd., NRI Financial Services Limited, Appeal, Popular Construction, OMP, EFA(OS

PRODUCT: Award, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Award, Judgment, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

ORDINAL: first, Firstly, Secondly

GPE: Counsel, Counsel, India, India, India, Govt, India, Govt, India, New Delhi

TIME: the light of day, 9-12-2004