innovative Tech Pack Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Sep-29-2000

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

LAW: Section 143(1)(a, the IT Act, Section 115JA, Section 143(1)(a, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 211, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 143(3, Section 143(3, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1A, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)fa, the Companies Act, the IT Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 115JA, ITD 99, the Companies Act, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 143(1)(a, Section 115J, Section 143(1)(a, Section 143(1)(a

CARDINAL: 1, 1,03,59,205, 10,01,856, 3, 10,01,856, 29,38,067.41, 29,38,057.41, 8, 9, 1, 2, 1, 2, II, 1, 64, 741, 69ITD 187, 2, 48, 577, 46, 4, 196, 5, 203, 658, 6, 98, 7, 56, two, 88, 77, 15, 2, 65, 345, 57, 433, 60, 30, 18, 56, 30, 2, 22, 2, 23, 10

DATE: 1961, 1997-98, previous years, previous year, previous year, the earlier years, the previous year, earlier year, earlier years, the earlier year, earlier year, the year, previous year, the year, the year 1991-92, the years, yr.1993-94, the financial year 1994-95 and 1995-96, the financial year 1996-97, 1997-98, current year, the year, 1997-98, 1999, 1999, 1994, 1993, 1992, 55, 1993, 1975, 1953, 1965, the assessment year, 1973, 1970, past years, 143fl)(a, earlier previous years, the previous year, previous year, several previous years, several previous years, 1999, 1997, 1997, the previous year, previous year, previous year, yr.1997-98, earlier year, the earlier year, the earlier year, 1965, October, 1974, October, 1964, the assessment year, the previous year

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, first, third, third

MONEY: 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent, 30 per cent

ORG: AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, AO, the Research Committee, the Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Annexure-A-55, the Institute of Chartered Accountants, AO, Clauses, AO, AM Ltd., Asstt, CIT, TTJ, Sipani Automobiles Ltd., CIT, TTJ, Bang, ITD 280, Khatau Junkar Ltd., ITR, Asstt, CIT, Challapalli Sugar Ltd., Ors, CIT, SC, Bombay Steam Navigaton Co., CIT, AO, AO, AO, AO, the Supreme Court, CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd., SC, CIT, Kullu Valley Transport Co., Departmental Representative, AO, AO, Parts II &amp, Simpani Automobiles Ltd., AO, the Tribunal Delhi Bench ', Care Heart India Ltd., CIT, TTJ, AO, AO, Wvg, TTJ, Departmental Representative, AO, Parts II &amp, the Research Committee, the Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Research Committee, the Council of Institute of Chartered Accountants, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, SC, the Research Committee, Departmental Representative, Wvg, Tribunal, Schedule VI, Schedule VI, Pan I, Departmental Representative, Sipani Automobiles Ltd., AO, AO, Departmental Representative, Care Heart India Ltd., AO, AO, AO, AO, Departmental Representative, Departmental Representative

GPE: Rs.1,73,03,618.15, India, J.K.

PRODUCT: Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA, Section 115JA

PERSON: K.S. Pathania, Anr, Mahalakshmi Glass Works Ltd., Sunil Gupta, Schedule VI, J.K.Cotton Spg. &amp, Ltd- v. CIT, Challapali Sugars, Cotton Spg