Mukesh Gupta Vs. P.K. Banaj and anr.

Decided On : Nov-20-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: the N.I. Act, the Punjab Registration of Money Lenders Act, Section 269 SS, Section 138, the Punjab Registration of Money Lenders' Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 69-A, Section 269SS, the Income Tax Act

CARDINAL: 15, 1, 18.11.2000, 10, 2, 2, 10, 5, 5, 1, 4.3.2001, 1.12.2001, 1.1, 1, two, 3, 5, 1.3.2002, 23,61,665/-, 15, 11, 15, 18.11.2000, 10, 4.3.2001, 15, 64,165, 3.8.2003, 15,0000, 23,61,665/-, 1, 1, 1, 1.43, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, two, 15, 2, 3, 3, 2.2.2006, three, 1, 18.11.2000, 10, Ten, 10,0000/-, 18.11.2000, 4.3.2001, 1, Five, 1, 1.1, 9.2.2002, 1, three, 5, 1.3.2002, 1, three, Three, 8.4.2002, three, 1, two, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 30, 1, three, 1.12.2001, 1.1, 2, four, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2.2.2006, 2, 8), 69, 69, 1 to 3, 17.8.2005, 15, three, 5, 1, 3, 2.2.2006.40, 2, two, two, two, 2, 4, 5, 15, 5, two, 25, two

PERCENT: 22%, 22%, 22%, 22%, Twenty two percent, 20%, 22%

PRODUCT: Section 138

PERSON: V.K. Goel, M.M., 69B, Araan Bajaj S/o, Sd/- Sd/-(P.K. BAJAJ, PW-1/5, PW-1/12, FDR, Vrinda Kumari

ORDINAL: second, second, third, third, second

GPE: p.a., him.7, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064, p.a., BAJAJ).14, PW-1/9, PW-1/11, Ex, Counsel, p.a., M.M., Delhi

ORG: S.L. Prakashan, S.L. Prakashan, S.L. Prakashan, S.L., statement?4, Sections 69A, Plaintiff, Lacs, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, S.L. Prakashan, Nutan Kumar, Ors, Ors, Learned Counsel, the Income Tax Return, TDS, Court, Patiala House

DATE: 17.5.2005:1, a period of, six months, today, first week of every month, six months, Monthly, 2.2.2006, 2002, 1961, 17.8.2005, 17.8.2005, 17.8.2005, 17.8.2005

NORP: issues.33