Mohd. Farukh Vs. State of N.C.T. of Delhi

Decided On : Sep-22-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 18, Section 50 of the NDPS Act, Section 50, Section 50, Section 50 of the Act, Section 50 of the Act, Section 50, Section 50, Section 50, Section 50, Section 57, Section 57

PERSON: J.M. Malik, Subzi Mandi, Counsel, Namdi Francis Nwazor v. Union, Francis Nwazor v. Union, Namdi Francis Nwazor, Balwant Rai, Krishna Kanwar @ Thakuraeen v. State, Balbir Singh, Rangi Ram v. State, Bir Singh, Kiran Pal, Radhey Shyam, Radhey Shyam, Khuji @ Surender, Tewari, Badri Yadav, Anr

NORP: J.1, Punjab

ORG: Rigorous Imprisonment, Rigorous Imprisonment, Palace Cinema, Learned Counsel, CCR, the State of H.P. v., State, Haryana v. Ranbir Singh @ Rana 2006 SCC 166, State, H.P., State of Punjab, R.S. Dhaiya, S.I. PW8, State of Madhya Pradesh, SC, Court, Court

DATE: ten years, one year, 23rd March, 1992, 1997, 2005, 2005, 1998, 1998, 2005, 2005 III AD, 2001, 1994, 19.02.2001, 22.03.2001, 1991, 2006

CARDINAL: One, 10, two, one, 1, 27, 1, 4, 4, 350, 4, 385, 8), 8), 4, 350.5, 407.6, 89, 453, 3, 2, 1041.8, 23.08.1999, 23.08.1999, 4, 154.9, one

PRODUCT: Lac, Act.4

TIME: about 5.25 PM

ORDINAL: first

GPE: S.C., S.C., Sajan Abraham v. State, Kerala, S.C., S.C., Surender

WORK_OF_ART: Pawan Kumar, Pawan Kumar

EVENT: S.C. 1853