Semantic Analysis by spaCy
income Tax Officer Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of
Decided On : Jul-31-2000
Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal
LAW: Section 201(1A, Section 192(1, the IT Act, Section 201, the IT Act, Section 201, ITR 832, Section 201(1A, Section 192(1, the IT Act, Section 201(1A, Section 201(1A, Section 201, the IT Act, Section 201(1A, Section 143(1)(a, the Constitutional Bench, the IT Act, the Hyderabad Bench, the Control Act, Section 56, Section 191, Chapter-XVII, Section 192, Section 191, Section 201(1 A, Section 191, Section 201(1A, Section 192, Section 201(1A, ITR 832
CARDINAL: 1, two, 2,001, 2,466, 25,000, 232, 216, 3, 4.1, 140, 2,001, 2,466, 4, 176, 212, 512, 243, 6, 56, 164, 167, 6, 7, 140
DATE: 1988-89, 1989-90, 12 days, Oct., 1992, 1992, 1998, 1989, 1962-63, the financial year, that financial year, 1983, the years, 1987-88, 1988-89, 1989, 1st April, 1962, 1989, 1995, 2000, 1996, 1983
ORG: AO, Tribunal, Delhi High Court, CIT, CBDT, Department, CBDT, Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, CBDT, the IT Department, The High Court, Departmental, High Courts, Suffice, C.C.A., C.C.A., C.C.A., Direct Taxes Amendment Laws, the Calcutta High Court, the Calcutta High Court, C.C.A., Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Rayon Silks Co. Ltd., CIT, ITO, C.C.A., the Calcutta High Court, C.C.A., ITO, CCA, All India Insurance Employees Association v. Union of India, Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, the Calcutta High Court, Modern Fibotex India Ltd., CIT, it.5, Modern Fibotex India Ltd., Their Lordships of, the Supreme Court, CIT, Hindustan Electro Graphites Ltd., SC, the Supreme Court, Binjraj v. Union of India, Asstt, CIT v. Jindal Irrigation Systems Ltd., vana seu inutilia, Tribunal, Modern Fibotex India Ltd., the Supreme Court, Hindustan Electro Graphites Ltd., High Court, the Calcutta High Court, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Gwalior Rayon Silk Co. Ltd., CIT
ORDINAL: second, 28th, first
PERSON: Ruma Pal, Calcutta High Court, lex nil, lex neminem
GPE: Pannalal
PRODUCT: Calcutta