Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd.

Decided On : Nov-24-2005

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 9, Section 9, Order 39 Rule 1, Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure

PERSON: Swatanter Kumar, J.1, Lira 2,800,454,777, Lira 2,800,454,777, Gautam Ray, Jaiprakash, Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd., Anr, R.K. Anand, Contractor, final.10, Anr, Anr, Anr, Guillermo Rodriguez Gomez, Anr, John Donaldson, Handelsbanken, Itek Corpn., Anr, Handelsbanken, Sugar Corpn, Sugar Corpn, John Donaldson, Handelsbanken, Sugar Corpn, Gautam Ray, expensesNJJV, Annex 1, S. R. NarasimhanChairman

ORG: The Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited, NJPC Ltd, the Disputes Review Board, DRB, Engineer, the Bank Guarantee No., Frankfurt Branch, Joint Venture of M/s, Milano)-Italy and M/s Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd., Nathpa Jhakri Power Corporation)Power Corporation Ltd., INR 230,427,162, Bank Guarantee, the Notice for Invocation of the above, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, INR 230,427,162, INR 230,427,162, Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam Ltd., State Bank of India, CAG Branch, Barakhamba Road, Satluj Jal Vidyut Nigam, Finance)2, DRB, the World Bank, Project, Consultants, Claims Review Committee, the General Conditions of Contract, DRB, Board, ADRB, GCC, Board, Board, ADRB, Time, Board, Board, Board, 900/5203, Bank San Paolo IMI SPA, State Bank of India, Frankfurt Branch, grounds:(a, Hyundai, OMP No, Court, the Supreme Court, Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd., Prem Heavy Engineering Works, Daewoo Motors India Ltd., Union of India and Ors, the Supreme Court, Bank, The Supreme Court, Court, DRB, ADRB, Court, ADRB, EOT, ADRB, Court, the Disputes Review Board, DRB, ADRB, Engineer, Engineer, Engineer, CMD, NJPC, CMD, CMD, the Dispute Review Board, DRB, Board, Board, NJPC, DRB, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., State of Bihar and Ors, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., Tarapore & Co., Daewoo Motors India Ltd., Union of India, Federal Bank Ltd., V.M. Jog Engineering Ltd., Ors, Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd., Prem Heavy Engineering Works, U.P. States Sugar Corporation, Sumac International Ltd., Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., Tarapore & Co., Delhi High Court, Neeman Medical International, UP State Sugar Corporation, Sumac International Ltd., the Supreme Court, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., Court, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., the Supreme Court, Ansal Engineering Projects Ltd., Tehri Hydro Development Corporation Ltd., the Supreme Court, UP State Sugar Corporation, the Supreme Court, Court, M.R., Bolivinter Oil SA, Chase Manhattan Bank, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, First National Bank of Boston 566, Court, U.P. Coop, Federation Ltd., the Imperial Government of Iran, an American Bank, an Iranian Bank, the American Government, the Iranian Government, The US Government, Court, the American Courts, Court, Larsen & Toubro Ltd.v, Maharashtra SEB :, Hindustan Steel Workers Construction Ltd., G.S. Atwal & Co., National Thermal Power Corpn., State, Maharashtra v. National Construction Co., Court, Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., Tarapore & Co., Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd., Prem Heavy Engineering, P) Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, Larson & Toubro Ltd., Maharashtra SEB :, Hindustan Steel Workers Construction Ltd., V. G.S. Atwal & Co., U.P. State, Sumac International Ltd., Court, U.P. State, M.R., Bolivinter Oil SA, Chase Manhattan Bank, Court, U.P. Coop, Federation Ltd., Singh Consultants and Engineers, Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Government, Government, Court, U.P. Coop, Federation Ltd., Singh Consultants & Engineers, Bolivinter Oil SA, Chase Manhattan Bank, Larson & Toubro Ltd., Maharashtra SEB :, Hindustan Steel Workers Construction Ltd., V. G.S. Atwal & Co., National Thermal Power Corpn., Maharashtra v. National Construction Co., Hindustan Steelworks Construction Ltd., Tarapore & Co., U.P. State, Sumac International Ltd., Bank, HCCL, Executive Engineer, Bank, Executive, Federal Bank Ltd., the Supreme Court, Daewoo Motors India Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Ejusdem, Dated:20.09.2003ToBank Sao PaolomiPiazza Cordusio, Confirmation of Bank Guarantee-reg, NJJV, A-137, Colony, New Delhi-110024, Bank Guarantees, DRB, The Additional Dispute Review Board, ADRB, RecommendationsThe, ADRB, GCC, Bank GuaranteesFinancing CostsAnd, Sealed Envelope, ExpatriatesStaff, ExpenseRadio, NJJV, DRB, BOQ, ADRB, NJJV, NJJV, ADRB, CMD, DRB, the Bank Guarantees No, 900/5203, Bank San Paolo IMI SPA, State Bank of India, Frankfurt Branch, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal

DATE: 1642, 2729, 26th May, 1993, 12 months, between 15.11.1995 and 08.04.2002, 07.07.2003, one year, 8th July, 2002, 07.07.2003, 07.07.2003, 21 October, 1999, 16th Dec. 1999, 14 Jan, 2003, 07.07.2003, 9th July, 2003, 20th September, 2003, 25 months, 30th June, 1997, 50.53 months, up to 8th July, 38.04 months, June 2001.3.EOT, 38.04 months, 21st April, 2004, 28th April, 2005, the year 1998, 7th July 2003, 23rd July, 2004, 31st May, 2005, three months, 12th May, 2005, 30th September, 2005, 1996, February 25, 2003, monthly, 1.1.1998 to, 31.12.2002, Today, 50.53 months, 39.97 month's, 7th July, 8th July, 2003, one day, 7th July, 2003, 9th July, 2003, 23rd July, 2004, 18th July, 2004, 39.97 months, 10.56 months, May, 2005, 7th July, 2003, today, a period of, 30 days, 15 days, 15 days, 30 days, 2001, 2193/2003, 13th August, 2004, 1984, else.14, 1984, 1988]1SCR1124, 1984, 8th July, 2003, 7th July, 2003, 20th September, 2003, 220121, 07.07.2003, up to 23rd July, 2004, 00911782275549 00911782275549, 9th July, 2003, 16th July, 2004, 50.53 months, up to 8th July, 38.04 months, June 2001.3.EOT, 38.04 months, 7th July, 2003, July 2004, 20.09.2003, 1996, 13.4.2004, 7.6.2005, 5872/2005

CARDINAL: 2.2, one, 17, 10, 60, 53.76, 21.101999.Dear, 120099.Sesio, 400, Two hundred thirty million, two hundred thirty million, Two hundred thirty million, 01000001047, 23, 35.98, 67, 2002.2.Extension, 41, 35.98, 1, 4, 73.44, 35.98, 104, 123.97, 5, 900/5260, 900/5346, 900/5408, 900/5454, 900/5559, 900/5574, 900/5591,900/5640, 99/202, 6, 251/2003, 2003(153)ELT32(SC, One, 300, 8.12.2004, 68.49, 3.00, 53.12, 56.32, 53, 62.85, 2003.8, 9, 50 millions, 11, 2003(153)ELT32(SC, 1, 663, only two, 1996)5SCC450, two, only two, 1, 351, 197)The, 566, 52, 566, 1996]1SCR293, 13)The, 16, 12)The, only two, 1, 351, 1, 1996]1SCR293, 9, one, 5, 5, 2.2, 44, 2002.2.Extension, 41, 4,083.95 millions, ADRB.25, 5, one, 900/5260, 900/5346, 900/5408, 900/5454, 900/5559, 900/5574, 900/5591,900/5640, 99/202, 2

GPE: BranchNew Delhi, San Giovanni, Mumbai, US, Frankfurt, US, US, New-Delhi, India, p.a., Forums, CS(OS, Svenska, USA, Iran, United States, Iran, Itek, Svenska, Svenska, Forums, Kotla, Delhi

NORP: Indian, Indian, Italian, Indian, Italian, 900/5484, Rs.115, Indian, American, Iranian, Indian, Indian, advances/, 900/5484

MONEY: 2,435,522, 2,435,522, 2,435,522, the 10 per cent, 10#, 225.54 million, US$ 3.35 million

ORDINAL: first, first, firstly, first, 7th, first, second, Secondly, second, second, Firstly

PRODUCT: Consortium, Clause 67, CA, Report, contract.26

PERCENT: 10%, 10%, 10%

TIME: 1988]1SCR1124, 1988]1SCR1124

FAC: the Itek Corpn

EVENT: the Iranian revolution

WORK_OF_ART: Contract Agreement