Chemtura Corporation Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Aug-28-2009

Court: Delhi

LAW: Section 48, Section 53, the Patents Act, Section 11A(7, Section 80, Section 8 of the Act, Section 64(1, Section 13(4, Section 12, Section 25, Section 48 of the Act, Section 8, Section 64(1, Section 47 of the Act, Section 48, Section 48, Section 47 of the Act, Section 8(1)(a, Section 8(2, Section 64, Section 64(1)(h, Section 3(d, Section 48, Section 47, Section 156, Section 47, Section 64, Section 107, Section 48 of the Act, Section 13(4, Section 8, Section 64(1, Section 8 36, Section 8 of the Act, Section 8(1)(a, Section 8(1, Section 8(2, Section 64(1)(j, Section 8, Section 64(1)(m, Section 12, the Patents Act, Section 21(1, Section 8(2, the Rule 15, Section 24(4, Section 43(1)(b, Section 8(2, Section 8, Section 64(1)(m, Section 48, Section 47, Section 48(1, Section 48, Section 48, Section 13(4, Section 47 of the Act 50, Section 48, Section 156, Section 48, Section 47, Section 48, Section 47, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156, Section 47 of the Act, Section 47 of the Act, Section 47, Section 47(1, Section 47 of the Act

PERSON: S. Muralidhar, Aryan Exporters Pvt, tonnes axle, Ajaib Singh, Ajaib Singh, Subject, Defendants 2, Railways, Richard L. Palinkas, Defendants 2, Controller, Shanti Bhushan, K. Ramu v. Adyar, Ananda Bhavan, Muthulakshmi Bhavan, Mariappan, A.R. Safiullah 2008, Shanti Bhushan, Controller, Shanti Bhushan, Shanti Bhushan, Shanti Bhushan, Corpn 1973, Ajay Kumar Gupta, S. Majumdar, Gupta, Gupta, J. Mitra v., Kesar Medicaments, F. Hoffmann-LA Roche Ltd., Gupta, Defendants 2, Majumdar, Gupta, Shanti Bhushan, Surendra Lal Mahendra v. Jain Glazers, Abbot Laboratories, Erico Intll Corprn, Vutec Corprn, Controller, Controller, Gresham, P.M. Road, Shanti Bhushan, Controller, Controller, Controller, Shanti Bhushan, Shanti Bhushan, K. Ramu v. Adyar Ananda Bhavan, Mariappan, Railways, Railways, Nagpur Bench, Item, I.A. Nos

ORG: J. IA, CPC, CPC, Plaintiff, CPC, Plaintiff, the Consortium of, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, CPC, Defendants, the Defendants of Rs, Plaintiff, Defendants, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the State of Delaware, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, PCT, PCT International Application, Plaintiff, the Patent Office, a First Examination Report, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, PCT, Plaintiff, the Register of Patents, the Patent Office, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc., Crompton Manufacturing Company Inc., Crompton Manufacturing Company Inc., Chemtura USA Corporation, Chemtura USA Corporation, Chemtura Corporation, Plaintiff, Avadh Rubber Ltd., Prag Industries, the Union of India, the Ministry of Railways, Original Equipment Manufacturers, Research Designs & Standards Organisation, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the PCT International Application, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Bearer Pad Assembly, Plaintiff, Constant Contact Side Bearer, Cansub Bogies, Railway Board, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, RDSO, the Consortium of the Defendants 2 to 4, Mechanical Railway Board, Consortium, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Chemist, M/s. Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc., Plaintiff, Defendants, the Ministry of Railways, Defendants, Plaintiff, Consortium, the Bearer Pad Assembly, Consortium, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Railway Board, Railway Board, CPC, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Advocate for Defendants 2, Plaintiff, Consortium, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board, IPAB, Notice, Plaintiff, IPAB, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, IPAB, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendants, Consortium, Court, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, M/s. Uniroyal Chemical Company Inc., Chemtura Corporation, IPAB, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, IPAB, Plaintiff, Defendants, International Application, the International Application, the US Patent Authority, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the US Patent Office, Plaintiff, the European Examining Authority, Plaintiff, the European Patent Office, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the First Examination Report, FER, Plaintiff, Controller, the Patents Rules 2003, USPTO, JPO, Plaintiff, the Patent Examiner, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the US Patent Authorities, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the US Patent Office, the European Patent Office, Defendants, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Indian Railways Standard Condition Clause, the Ministry of Railways, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Controller of Patents, Plaintiff, IPAB, IPAB, Reliance, Telemecanique & Controls, Schneider Electric Industries SA, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the US Patent Office, the European Patent Office, Plaintiff, Wikipedia, PCT, PCT, State, Valensi British Radio, Counsel, Plaintiff, Bajaj Auto Ltd., TVS Motor Company Ltd., B. Braun Melsungen, Rishi Baid, Cipla Ltd., Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Sections 68 and 69 of the Act, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Ministry of Railways, Plaintiff, Government, Counsel for the Defendants 2, Plaintiff, Controller, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Garware Wall Ropes Ltd., A.I. Chopra 2009, Railways, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Defendants, F. Hoffmann- LA Roche Limited v., Cipla Limited, Court, Roche, Plaintiff, Roche, the Defendant Cipla, Roche, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Biswanath Prasad Radhey Shyam, Hindustan Metal Industries, Standipack Pvt, Oswal Trading Co. Ltd., AIR, Bilcare Ltd., Amartara Pvt. Ltd., BeechamGroup Ltd., Bristol Laboratories Pty Ltd., CLR, Australian Broadcasting Corporation, ONeill, ALR, Hexal Australia Pty Ltd., Roche Therapeutics Inc., Andrx Pharmaceuticals Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals, the Federal Circuit, the Court of Appeals, Helifix Ltd., Blok-Lok Ltd., U.S. Court of Appeals, the Federal Circuit, Cipla, Roche, the Division Bench, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Controller, Plaintiff, National Phase Application, the PCT Application, Plaintiff, The International Application, Plaintiff, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Plaintiff, PCT, Controller, Controller, Controller, Plaintiff, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, Controller, the Plaintiff of Section 8(2, Plaintiff, Remfry & Sagar, House, Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc., the Patents (Amendment) Act, U/R 24, Patents Rules, Pinkesh K. Jain, Patents & Design For Asstt, Controller of Patents & Design Encl:1, the Patents Rules, USPTO, JPO, Office, un, Plaintiff, Clauses 7, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Patent Office, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Patent Office, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the US Patent Office, Office Action, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Clauses 1, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Office Action, the Examiner Report, the Patents Rules 2003, USPTO, JPO, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Controller, Plaintiff, Controller, Plaintiff, Controller, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Telemecanique & Controls, Court, the Indian Railways Standard Condition, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Bajaj Auto Ltd., TVS Motor Company Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, IPAB, Court, the Ministry of Railways, the Director General (, Cansub, HS, PU, Alt.1, Plaintiff, Railways, Clauses 1701, the Indian Railways Standard Condition, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Ministry of Railways, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Defendants, Consortium, Government, Government, Garware Wall Ropes Limited, A.I. Chopra, the Bombay High Court, Court, Government, Government, the Ministry of Railways, the Ministry of Railways, Plaintiff, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, RDSO, Consortium, Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, Court, Court, Plaintiff, Court, IPAB

CARDINAL: 4, 1, 1, 2, 1, 2 to 4, 2 to 4, 2, 3, 4, 3, 2, 3, 4, 4, 3, 5, 2, 1, 3., 4., two, 5, 6, 9, 7,083,165, 14, 16, three, 8, 9, three, three, 1, two, 10, 11, 2 to 4, 3, 23, 3, one, 6, 14, 1, at least one, 12, 2 to 4, 3, 2, 2, 3, 4, 13, 3, 46,800, 2 to 4, 3, 2,300/-, 3,300/-, 3, 4, 2, 4, 1, 14, 4, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 2, 3, 2, 3, 4, 4, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 1, 2, 3, two, 16, 2, 3, 4, 7, 17, at least one, 3, 4, 18, 2, 1, 8, 19, 8, 3, 4, at least five, 20, 1, 21, 2, 3, 22, 23, 34, 38, 341, 94, 24, 8, 25, 564, 337, 26, 2008(36, 36, 568, 40, 193, 40, 125, 27, three, 28, 14, 3, 4, 29, 3, 30, 31, 111, 32, 33, 34, 53, 34, 11, 511, 118, 618, 2006)229, 66, 325, 208, 3, 4, One, 38, 39, 8, 1, 2, 41, 1, 001, 26.08.2004, 4, 1 2, 3, 4, 1., 1, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 3., 5, 4, 5, 6, 8., 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 42., two, 5, 8, 43, 7, 1 to 8, 10 to 16, 3, 10, 22, 45, 34, 1702, 47, 1, 107, 49, 8(2, as many as ten, 22, 01.09.2004, three, 1702, 51, 47, 1, 2, 3, 4.. 52, 156, 2 to 4, 3, 4, 3, 4, 56, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 57, one

DATE: 6782/2009, 213608, January 9, 2008, 27th May 2009, 8372/2009, 27th September 1999, August 2006, 21st June 2001, 15th September 2000, 20th October 2004, 9th January 2008, 213608, a period of, 20 years, annually, 1970, 213608, 9th January 2008, 20 years, 15th September 2000, 20 years, 15th September 2000, 19th July 2003, 20th April 2007, 19th July 2003, 1st May 2008, 11th February 2009, 40 years, spring, at least the first, 27th October 2008, November 2008, November 2008, 27th October 2008, 45 days, 17th December 2008, 4th December 2008, September 2008, 15th September 2000, 20th May 2009, 27th May 2009, that day, 4, 5 15, 8372/2009, 213608, about 27th September 1999, 15th September 2000, April 2001, 4566678, spring, spring, spring, about 1st, August 2006, at least one spring, 20th October 2004, spring, a period of, 30 days, October 2005, between 15th and 19th October 2005, October 19, 2005, between 21st June 2001, October 19, 2005, 26th July 2001, June 12, 2002, at least 30 months, about 20/21 months, 1701, 4, 3932005, 3932005, 13th January 1976, 2007, 20th October 2004, October 2005, 2008, 2009, 2009, 3, 3932005, 13th January 1976, 3932005, spring, May 2009, 2002, 1444, 2007, 1979, 1967-68, 22nd June 2006, 05-1433, 1339, 1359, 2007-1168, Form 3, 2003, Form 3. 37, 15th September 2000, 21st June 2001, 1999, three months, 20th October 2004, 2654, 1970, 2002, 4 months, 2003, 12 months, 12 months, 6, 13, 14, 2003, a period of, 30 days, 2002, Form 5, 2003, four months, four months, 17th October 2005, 10 and 11, 8, 17th October 2005, 17th October 2005, 8, 19th October 2005, 44, 21st June 2001, 19th October 2005, 26th July 2001, 25th September 2001, 15th January 2002, 8th February 2002, 2nd July 2002, 19th November 2002, 18th February 2003, 19th November 2002, 21st December 2004, 20th June 2005, 13th September 2004, 20th October 2004, June 2001, spring, 3932005, 13th January 1976, 46, 2007, 2002, 2002, 20th May 2003, 48, 23rd/25th June 2004, 1702, 54, 55, May 27th 2009, two weeks, annual, 58, 8372, 2009

GPE: United States of America, India, USA, India, India, India, Lucknow, Bilaspur, Bilaspur, India, Dehradun, USA, USA, US, India, India, US, US, US, US, US, US, India, US, India, India, India, US, US, India, India, India, India, India, Del., Del., Del., US, India, India, India, Mumbai, India, India, Clause, India, India, US, India, India, India, India, US, India, India, US, US, US, India, India, India, India, Sections, Lucknow

ORDINAL: secondary, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, second, second, first, first, second, second, second, second, second, first, third, third, first, first, second, second, 3rd, 24th, 9th, 5th, 14th, third, 15th, Secondly, first, FIRST, first, first, third, third, third, third

FAC: bolter springs, Sections 64, Sections 47

LOC: bearer mount, Plaintiff, the South East Central Railway, Europe, Europe, Plaintiff, Single, Single, Europe, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Single

NORP: L-1, European, European, European, European, Indian, European, Rules, contra, Rules, European, Indian, Indian, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: The Case of the Defendants 2, The Patents Rule

PRODUCT: Calcutta, DLT 865, Information, Sections 99 and 100 of the Act

PERCENT: 80%, 95%, 5%, 95%, 95%, barely 5%, 5%

TIME: 9 and 10