Mr. Diljeet Titus, Advocate Vs. Mr. Alfred A. Adebare and ors.

Decided On : May-08-2006

Court : Delhi

LAW: Order 39, Order 39, the Advocates Act, the Advocates Act, Section (II, Section 126, the Evidence Act', the Copyright Act, Section 13(1)(a, Section 126 of the Evidence Act, Section 126 of the Evidence Act, Rule 17, Section 482, Section 482, Section 381/385/386 IPC, Section 66, the IT Act, Section 6, the Indian Partnership Act, chapter 6, the Copyright Act, Order 7 Rule 14, Section 17, the Copyright Act, Section 2(d, Section 17, section 41, Section VII ' Section on other Employments47, Rule 49, Section 115 of the Evidence Act, the Labour Law or, Section 17(a, Section 17(b, the Copyright Act, Rule 49, Section 210, the Contract Act, Section 27 of the Act, Section 126 of the Evidence Act, the Copyright Act, Section 14, the Copyright Act, Section 16, the Copyright Act, Section 17, the Copyright Act, Section 16, the Copyright Act, Section 126 of the Evidence Act, Rule 49 of Section VII of the Bar Council of India Rules, Section 16, the Copyright Act, the Copyright Act, Section 2(o, the Copyright Act, Section 17, Section 16

PERSON: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Diljeet Titus, Titus, Titus, Titus, Seema, Alishan Naqvee, Dimpy Mohanty, Alfred A. Adebare, Titus, Arun Jaitley, Titus, Titus, Titus, Titus, Adebare, Naqvi, Adebare, Adebare, Adebare, Titus, Counsel, Counsel, Hire Agreements, S.D. Gupta, Dasuram Murzamull, Counsel, Ram Singh, U.T. Chandigarh, David Bainbridge, Copyright Law, Raphaelite, Rajnish Chibber, Anr, Skone James, David Bainbridge, Writing, McComas, Davison, Gonski, disadvantage.27, Hibben, Counsel, Handel en, LORD WRIGHT, Nora Beloff v., Pressdram Limited, Anr, J., Coco, A.N. Clark, Saltman, Margaret, Counsel, V.P. Singh, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, Subject, Radhakrishnan, Diljeet Titus, Adebare, Titus, Adebare, Adebare, Adebare, Seema Ahluwalia, Counsel, Counsel, Anr, Vasantha P. Nair, V.P. Shantha, Scruttom L.J., Rupert M. Jackson, John L. Powell, Jackson, Powell, 3rd Ed., Krishan Murgai, David D. Field's, Counsel, Counsel, Counsel, M.P. Davis, P. Larue Simpson v. Ernst, Gandhi, Richard Attenborough, Ramanand Sagar, Gandhi, Davis, Davis, W. Raleigh, Arthur Hugh Clough ', Counsel, Ram Singh, David Bainbridge, Copyright Law, P. Narayanan, Robb, Nora Beloff, Megarry J., Coco, A.N. Clark, Margaret, Aristotle, Anr, John W. Gardner

DATE: 6695/2004, 1109/2004, 7477/2004, 1257/20041, the last few years, 1109/2004, 1109/20044, the year 1989, April 1997, 1997, daily, March 2004, November 2003, Just a couple of days, September 2004, 2264/2004, 1961, daily, 1957, a particular month, 1932, 1 January 1998.23, 61 (1996, a couple of years, 1895, 1992, 1968 3, 1935, 1973, 1969, 1965, 1895, 1967, 1908, '17, 47, 49, five years, a period of, seven years, two years, three years, today, today, 1976, 1919 1, the twentieth century, 1-01, 03, 1986, 1981)ILLJ121SC, 1872, 14, 16, 1959]35ITR803(SC, 1996, 0356, years, four days, the present day, 6695/2004, 1109/2004, 7477/2004, 1257/2004

CARDINAL: 1, 1, one, two, two, four, two-fold, 27, Two, four, 1, 1, 7.2, 1, 10, 1, 1, three, 1, over 3,000, 1, 1, 1, four, four, two, one, 14.9.2004, 17, 1)Any, 17(c, 6. Mode, 15, 15, one, two, 6, 7, 8, three, 6.28, 2, 17, 257, four, three, three, 215, 1, 611, one, 9, 34, 35, 2, 3, 1, 1, 4, 31.10.2002, five, 7, 17(c, two, 16, 1994]1SCR348, 6, 6, three, one, 1, one, 20, three, four, 22, seven, 25, 25, five, more than one, 2(o, 17, 16, 3, 4, 2, 3, two, two, one, two, two, four, one, one, 1, more than one

ORG: CPC, CS, CPC, CS, CS, M/s. Titus and Company, Court, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Singhania and Company, M/s. Singhania and Company, M/s. Singhania and Company, Local Area Network, LAN, the Delhi Police, the High Court, the Bar Council of India Rules, the Bar Council of India under Section 49(1)(c, the Bar Council of India, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Singhania and Company, M/s. Titus and Company, Counsel, the Bar Council of India Rules, Counsel, Court, the professional association of Mr. Titus, ACP, the TDS Certificate, Joint Venture Agreement, Lawyer, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Counsel, the Apex Court, Court, Burlington Home Shopping Pvt, XYZ Supplies Ltd., XYZ, General Guide, Court, Court, Counsel, under:6.28 Employee, document.26, Counsel, the Court of Appeal, Universal Thermosensors Ltd., ELR, Market Investigations Limited, Social Security, ELR, Bank, Scheepvaart N.V., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Market Investigation Limited, Control, Cooke, RPC 41, M.R., ELR, Llandundo Urban Council, ELR, Seager v. Copydex, Ltd., ELR, Court, Counsel, Government, the Bar Council of Indian Rules Section VII, State Bar Council, the Bar Council, Counsel, Singhania and Company, Priest, Titus, M/s. Titus and Company, the Managing Partner, Titus and Company, M/s. Titus and Company', M/s. Titus and Company, Titus, Titus and Company, TDS, Titus and Company, Income Tax Rules, Ors, Malayala Manorama Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, State, Ors, the State Government, Government, Government, the Bar Council of India Rules, Counsel, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Fletcher Moulton, Simmons v. Health Laundry Company, the National Forum, the Supreme Court, Executive Committee, Indian Medical Association, the Church, Medicine and Law, andiv)high, Professional Negligence, Counsel, the Supreme Court, Superintendence Company of, M/s. Titus and Company, Court, Counsel, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Counsel, Court, the Managing Committee, Counsel, Counsel, Non-Disclosure Agreements, M/s. Singhania and Company, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Titus and Company, TDS, The Supreme Court, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Singhania and Company, the Supreme Court, Court, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Titus and Company, M/s. Titus and Company, the Supreme Court, Marketing Investigation, Montreal Locomotive, service.79, Court, the Apex Court, State, Ors, the National Consumer Redressal Commission, Fletcher Moulton, Simmons v. Health Laundry Company, CS, CS

GPE: Jhingan, India, name.12, India, India, P.C., P.C., Counsel, catalogue.12, Montreal, Montreal, A.G., Canada, Slatford, L.J., U.S., DENNING, L.J., U.S.A., to.33, Counsel, Vakalatnama, V.T., bodies.46, L.J., Hom, New York, Counsel, Counsel, copyrightable.60, Vakalatnama, India, S.T. Gupta, Thou, question.74, Berlington, information.76, injury.82, L.J., associates.84

NORP: Nigerian, Rules, P. Narayan, Indian, Indian

LOC: Windows Server, Asia Law

MONEY: 20 per cent

ORDINAL: first, first, first, fourth, first, third, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, First, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, third, third, third, third, first, first, first, third

WORK_OF_ART: Copyright, Copyright and Industrial Designs, Copinger on Copyright, Laws in England, Draft Code

TIME: hourly

PRODUCT: 765, 895, Section 17(c

QUANTITY: nine associates.39

FAC: Laxmi Narain

EVENT: SC 888

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English