Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Cit Vs. Ms. Sadhna Chadha

Decided On : Dec-08-2003

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 260A, the Income Tax Act, the Finance Act, section 143(1)(a, section 143(1)(a, section 5 of the Act, section 23, section 23, section 22, section 23, section 23(1, section 22, section 260A of the Act, section 143(1)(a

ORG: D.K. Jain, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Connaught Place, State Bank of Saurashtra, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Calcutta High Court, Hamilton & Co., CIT, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act, and(b, the Calcutta High Court, Hamilton & Co., Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal

DATE: 1961, year 1996-97, '1, 2000, the previous year ended, year 1996-97, five months, previous year, the earlier years, the assessment year 1996-97.3, the previous year, year 1996-97, annual, more than 12 month, annual, the year, the year, the years, 1-8-1995, previous year, the assessment year 1996-97, the relevant year, the previous year, the previous year, annual, annual, 1976, Annual, annual, year, annual, annual, the previous year, such year, twelve months, annual, year, annual, year, the year, annual, annual, annual, the previous year, 12 months, annual, 12 months, the previous year, annual

CARDINAL: 25, 2, 2, 1-8-1995, 43,758, 8,976, 6,26,076, 1-3-1994, 31-3-1996, 31-8-1995, 2,18,790, two, one, 22, 23, 1992]194ITR391(Cal, 22, 23, 1-4-1976, 1, 1

PERSON: Delhi Bench-A, Prem Lata Bansal, Ltd.s

GPE: Delhi, New Delhi, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //