Sutlej Industries Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Decided On : Mar-10-2003

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 244A, the Income Tax Act, section 143(3)1/250, Income Tax Act, section 244A.4, section 244A(1, section 244A, section 244A(I, section 156, section 156, section 244A(1, section 244A, section 243, section 243, section 244A(1, section 140A(2, section 244A, the Income Tax Act, section 143(1)(a)/143(1B, Income Tax Act, section 143(1)(a, section 244A

PERSON: R.S. Syal, Doshi, S. Sundaram Pillai, V.R. Pattabiraman, Gargya, S. Sundaram Pillai's

CARDINAL: two, 1, 549, 182, 74, 254, 646, 2001]249ITR527(Delhi, 1985]2SCR643, 36, 169, 2001]252ITR542(Mad, 1995]216ITR759(SC, two, 7, 15, 1, 1

DATE: years 1994, 1995-96, year 1994-952, March 1997, 20-11-1994, June 1997, 30-10-1987, 1990, 48, 2000, 2002, 1990, every month, a month, the first date of April, 1962, a particular assessment year, the first day of the April, the end of the month, 1994-95, the month of March 1997, this year, Assessment year:, 1995-9613, '14, this year, year 1994-95, this year, the assessment year 1994-95, the assessment year 1994-95, this year, this year

ORDINAL: first, first, first

ORG: TDS, Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., CIT, CIT, CIT, Goodyear India Ltd., Hon'ble Supreme Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Weld Craft, ITO, TTJ, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, CIT, Ashok Leyland Ltd., Departmental Representative, Dhanvi Trading & Investment, Tribunal, Reliance, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Modi Industries Ltd., CIT, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Modi Industries Ltd.'s, TDS, the Income Tax Rules, CIT, Karamchari Union, Agra v. Union of India, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, distinguishable.10, Ashok Leyland Ltd.'s, Hooghly Mills Co. Ltd., Departmental Representative, Dhanvi Trading & Investment, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals

GPE: Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Hemlatha, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn, Explanationn

MONEY: two third per cent, 2000)IILLJ603SC .9