Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Coromandel Indag Products India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Decided On : Oct-30-2001

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 9(4, the Insecticides Act, the Companies Act, Section 9(3, Section 9(4, Section 9(3, Section 9(4, Section 9(3, Section 9(4, Section 9(4, Section 9(3, Section 9(3, Section 9(4, Section 9(3, Section 9(3, Section 9(4

PERSON: Mukul Mudgal, Rajiv Nayar, U. Hazarika, Joseph Vellapally, Order, Nos

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 3, 4, 4, 4, 1, 4, 2, 4, 2, 5, 1, 3, 4, 4, 4, 2, 6, 4, 1, 2, 2, 4, 1., 2, 4, 4, 1754/98, 2, 2 to 3, 8, 4, 2, two, 4, 9, 4, 10

DATE: 1968, 1956, twelve months, six months, two years, 19th of June, 1998, today

ORG: the Registration Committee, M/s. E.I.D. Parry, the Union of India, Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Registration Committee of Central Insecticide Board, the Central Insecticide Board & Registration Committee, Ministry of Agriculture &, M/s. EID Parry, Cartap Hydrochloride Technical ', CHT, Committee, Committee, Committee, Chemistry, Bioefficacy, Residues, Translocation, Toxicity Test-Short Term, Ecotoxicity Data, Medical Data, Union of India, RC, the Union of India, Union of India, RC, Chemical, Chemical, CHT, M/s. Nichimen Corporation, CHT, Certificate, CHT, Court, Bureau of Indian Standards, CW, Court, Union of India, Certificate, the Union of India, Chemical, the Union of India, Court, Chemical

GPE: Japan, Nichimen

NORP: Chinese

PRODUCT: 1 & 2

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //